babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.
17-year old youth dead after being stunned by Police Taser
quote:Originally posted by reglafella: "M.Spector maybe, said "get rid of the guns too!" or something to that effect and not a single word or sentence more. You've glammed on to that and made that your raison d'etre, so to speak."
Close. What really happened was that I responded to M. Spector, then others glommed onto me.
"Also, if you haven't yet realized it, this is not the place to cheer police brutality under ANY circumstances, even the loved ones protection scenario."
Where did I cheer police brutality?
I "cheered" having armed police. At least until we have unarmed criminals.
Strangely, even being the second person to accuse me of cheering for police brutality isn't considered negative attention. I don't regard that as a trivial accusation.
"Criminals" are people like you and me, maybe you should go to a court house and stay for a day. They are not all Clifford Olsens. They are ordinary people who are charged with various offences from a bar fight to stealing shoes from a Wal mart. Should all these people be killed if they become non compliant or even combative?
Well tasers introduce that possibility!
quote:"Canadians should be very concerned and think twice before they dial, the chance of them being indirectly resonsible for murdering an innocent person and child has sky rocketed."
If you call the cops and they come and taser someone, I can't see how you're the least bit responsible for that.
What you are saying here is if a cop tasers someone and that person dies on your property then don't worry be happy everything is alright as far as the propery owner is concerned, they are not responsible.
quote:"Then we'll take away their fucking guns."
What a great idea. I, for one, am very tired of the cops always taking control of situations and never letting the criminals have their way.
Everything is so clear to you. Criminal=arrest. Cop=good. But the real world is more complex and cops do abuse their powers on a daily basis. Criminals are my son or your daughter and "crimes" are not always clear cut bank robberies.
Sometimes it's someone sitting on a sidewalk who can't answer all the questions being put forth by a police officer.
quote:Could be, but just out of curiosity, what does this kind of vulnerability look like? I assume we're talking about a physical vulnerability?
And I ask because if being agitated or high (or whatever it is you're picturing) makes a person physically more likely to die if tased, that seems to me to be getting close to at least conceding that maybe the whole "excited delirium" thing isn't so laughable after all.
How about just standing in a puddle of water. Or maybe being confronted by two armed police causes you to feel "anxious". Do ya think?
Assuming the police are always right and the person they confront is always in the wrong is wrong dude. The police are NOT always right.
Don't bother saying you never said "Always", cuz it came through in every post you made.
Remember that police work for the state, the government pays them, do you believe the govenment has your best interests at heart?
quote:Police in the city of Winnfield, Louisiana are being accused of covering up the death of twenty-one-year-old Baron Pikes. He died in police custody on January 21 after being shot nine times with a taser gun while in handcuffs. The city police chief initially claimed that Pikes was high on crack cocaine and PCP at the time of his death. But the coroner recently ruled Pikes’ death to be a homicide, after an autopsy determined there were no drugs in his system.
Thanks for that link Spector. An important point that reglafella appears to miss is exemplified by this story (and also the one that spawned this thread), for disenfranchised minorities the interests of the police are usually quite clearly opposed to their own (afterall the police are charged with their overt oppression). Maybe reglafella's simplistic belief that cops = good as described upthread is easier to maintain because his own interests are closer to those of the police. I've noticed that comfortable white men tend to have a hard time shedding the illusion that cops = good; and I am one myself. I've had the benefit of a few "lessons" to correct this outlook; just step a little farther out side of the lines within which you are required to walk (those lines which the boy murdered in the incident which spawned this thread likely had the misfortune to be born outside of).
quote:Michael Langan, the teenager who died after police zapped him with a Taser, may have been a high-school dropout who wandered the streets of Winnipeg's inner-city core, but he didn't deserve to die like that, his father says.
"Nobody deserves to die that way, no matter how many problems you had," Brian Minchin told CBC News on Thursday.
What now?
quote:Minchin plans to go panhandling so he can try to get enough money to buy new shoes and a suit for his son's funeral.
Way to go, Winnipeg Police. That's Community Commitment for you!
"What you are saying here is if a cop tasers someone and that person dies on your property then don't worry be happy everything is alright as far as the propery owner is concerned, they are not responsible."
To be clear, I'm NOT saying "be happy".
I AM saying the homeowner is not responsible.
If a police officer kills someone, whether it's on or off of my property, whether it's because I called them or I didn't, THEY are responsible for what they do. As a citizen, the onus is not on me to be a passive victim.
Are you really telling me that if someone were trying to smash their way into your home, you would choose to NOT call the police? You'd just wait there by the door to see whether the intruder was going to harm you, rob you, or both?
Well, help yourself.
"But the real world is more complex and cops do abuse their powers on a daily basis."
Yes, they do. But I don't believe that's a good enough reason to disarm the police.
"Don't bother saying you never said "Always", cuz it came through in every post you made."
I'm a big boy. If I want to say something, I can type it right here on my keyboard. I don't need you or anyone else putting words in my mouth.
But that seems to be the norm around this place. Why tell the world what you think when you can tell the world what the other person thinks?
Hmm, reglafella. Not that I want to take away that bone you've got such a good grip on, but would you have any remarks about Brian Minchin, the dirt poor father of the 17-year old victim, who will be panhandling this weekend for decent clothes to attend his son's funeral?
I most surely support the disarming of any individual officer who abuses their power. Presumably, this disarming would be a natural part of immediately firing them.
But to disarm all police officers? Ya, great idea. Tell Canada that the left agrees that only the criminals should have guns.
Go ahead. Stand by it and get that idea out there!
quote: Are you really telling me that if someone were trying to smash their way into your home, you would choose to NOT call the police? You'd just wait there by the door to see whether the intruder was going to harm you, rob you, or both?
As someone to whom this has happened I'm afraid I have to burst your bubble: whether or not you call the police you WILL just "just wait there by the door" and if the intruder wants to "harm you, rob you, or both" they WILL do so (unless you are armed and personally able to stop the intruder).
Afterwards the police will probably show up to the scene to satisfy the requirements of their paperwork and to investigate you to determine if you are "respectable" (read white and rich) enough for them to follow up on your case. Even if you make the cut (I didn't) they are unlikely to find the intruder. If they DO find them, then you're free to consider whether you are in some way responsible for the actions of the police at that point; its a big IF by the way...
quote:Originally posted by It's Me D: As someone to whom this has happened I'm afraid I have to burst your bubble: whether or not you call the police you WILL just "just wait there by the door" and if the intruder wants to "harm you, rob you, or both" they WILL do so (unless you are armed and personally able to stop the intruder).
This happened to me, where they, the attempted burglars, thought they would break in through the glass in the basement door.
As I heard the glass break, when they threw a propane tank through it, I met them with a loaded rifle in their faces, as they tried to enter, after undoing the lock through the broken glass in the door. They ran, and I actually fired a shot into the tree trunk as they were running past it. Interestingly, I was furious, but not scared.
But I had just happened to be downstairs, and in the room where the rifles were kept, at the time and do not know what would have happened otherwise though. There was definitely no time to call the police even, until after it was all over. An officer did come though and took a report and that was the end of it from the RCMP perspective and I ever heard from them again about it.
"Personally I would try and help them; what kind of an asshole wouldn't? What would you do?"
At the risk of being obvious, I'd call the police.
I'm not Chuck Norris. If you prefer the bare-knuckle approach, help yourself though.
Mind you, if we can all arm ourselves as remind did, maybe I wouldn't see disarming the police as such as foolhardy idea. In that case I suppose I'd stand back and brace my gun against a pole for good aim and take my shot. But once we're all walking around armed, I'd think we'd all be wasting a lot more lives than police with tasers or even police with guns.
Sounds like you were lucky. We certainly had no weapons in the house although the police were called within the first minute and arrived well after the intruders had fled (after the break and enter, assault, attempted murder, and robbery). At least you never heard from the police again (disgusting the better outcome!), my previous roomates have been harassed by the police ever since, despite moving, because we had the especially unfortunate luck to be consuming some illegal drugs when the break and enter, assault, attempted murder, and robbery took place; I guess the police found the drugs to be more important [img]mad.gif" border="0[/img]
quote: Tell Canada that the left agrees that only the criminals should have guns.
But that is your position. If a cop violates the law, the right is always right there defending the violator - the criminal. Their is even a whole slew of movies glorifying police and vigilante murder. The right wing loves crime and criminals. It is why the right never has support for crime prevention but has all kinds of money for prisons where the right wing entertain their fantasies about male prisoners brutalizing and raping each other.
I was lucky, in numerous ways and there was no phone downstairs for me to use to call anyone and I would have had to run upstairs to find a phone, and by then it would have been too late.
In respect to seeing someone attacked, today, in the cell phone days it is easy to make a call to the RCMP as soon as you see it. Having said that, I would still jump in and try to rescue the attacked person, even if I had made the call, if I thought their life was in danger. And I have done so in the past.
"But that is your position. If a cop violates the law, the right is always right there defending the violator"
Is it? Or is it your imagination that it is?
Because not two whole hours ago I said:
I most surely support the disarming of any individual officer who abuses their power. Presumably, this disarming would be a natural part of immediately firing them.
How could you possibly read that an infer that my position is that criminal cops are OK? I mean, can you read? Do you have some kind of difficulty seeing all these funny shapes and making sense of them.
Is there any kind of policy around here regarding putting words in people's mouths? Yesterday I accused someone of endorsing a horrible thing because they accused me of endorsing a horrible thing, and surely enough, a moderator was calling me on the carpet for it in a flash, but nothing got said otherwise.
I find I'm spending more time responding to the things I've never said than the things I did say.
And I'm sure that for a lot of you the response will be "if you don't like it, go away". Ya, thanks for that. I'm getting the sense that you'd like me to leave. That's pretty clear. Does it occur to you, though, how many people watch you do your damndest to drive new members away if they won't mouth the same little oaths as you do? Do you ever wonder how many people decide that a clique like this just isn't worth their time?
Or is that just fine because you all are all you need, and anyone else is probably just a "troll" you don't need anyway?
Anyhow, back to the boy and the father who needs to panhandle in order to get clothes to attend the funeral, nbeltov, do you know if a fund has been started for the family? -------------------------
And, also, Poland is extremely upset with Canada, Canadians and the ability of the RCMP to investigate themselves. It is high time that this self investigation ability was ceased, and it should become a political plank!
quote:do you know if a fund has been started for the family?
Nope. Let me look into it.
ETA: Judging by the remarks on the CBC discussion around the story, there are plenty of people who would like to kill the father as well. Kick 'em when they're down! It's really quite vicious and disgusting.
Thanks for that link Beltov. The comments (with a few exceptions) are disgusting in the extreme; many people appear to feel that poverty is a crime, and one best punished with a death sentence.
quote:Originally posted by It's Me D: The comments (with a few exceptions) are disgusting in the extreme; many people appear to feel that poverty is a crime, and one best punished with a death sentence.
If this is a dream, let me never wake!
"Criminals" are people like you and me, maybe you should go to a court house and stay for a day. They are not all Clifford Olsens. They are ordinary people who are charged with various offences from a bar fight to stealing shoes from a Wal mart. Should all these people be killed if they become non compliant or even combative?
Well tasers introduce that possibility!
What you are saying here is if a cop tasers someone and that person dies on your property then don't worry be happy everything is alright as far as the propery owner is concerned, they are not responsible.
Everything is so clear to you. Criminal=arrest. Cop=good. But the real world is more complex and cops do abuse their powers on a daily basis. Criminals are my son or your daughter and "crimes" are not always clear cut bank robberies.
Sometimes it's someone sitting on a sidewalk who can't answer all the questions being put forth by a police officer.
How about just standing in a puddle of water. Or maybe being confronted by two armed police causes you to feel "anxious". Do ya think?
Assuming the police are always right and the person they confront is always in the wrong is wrong dude. The police are NOT always right.
Don't bother saying you never said "Always", cuz it came through in every post you made.
Remember that police work for the state, the government pays them, do you believe the govenment has your best interests at heart?
What now?
Way to go, Winnipeg Police. That's Community Commitment for you!
"Nobody deserves to die that way."
To be clear, I'm NOT saying "be happy".
I AM saying the homeowner is not responsible.
If a police officer kills someone, whether it's on or off of my property, whether it's because I called them or I didn't, THEY are responsible for what they do. As a citizen, the onus is not on me to be a passive victim.
Are you really telling me that if someone were trying to smash their way into your home, you would choose to NOT call the police? You'd just wait there by the door to see whether the intruder was going to harm you, rob you, or both?
Well, help yourself.
"But the real world is more complex and cops do abuse their powers on a daily basis."
Yes, they do. But I don't believe that's a good enough reason to disarm the police.
"Don't bother saying you never said "Always", cuz it came through in every post you made."
I'm a big boy. If I want to say something, I can type it right here on my keyboard. I don't need you or anyone else putting words in my mouth.
But that seems to be the norm around this place. Why tell the world what you think when you can tell the world what the other person thinks?
But if they abuse their power they are committing a crime and if they commit a crime they are criminals so you support the arming of criminals?
[ 25 July 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]
But to disarm all police officers? Ya, great idea. Tell Canada that the left agrees that only the criminals should have guns.
Go ahead. Stand by it and get that idea out there!
As someone to whom this has happened I'm afraid I have to burst your bubble: whether or not you call the police you WILL just "just wait there by the door" and if the intruder wants to "harm you, rob you, or both" they WILL do so (unless you are armed and personally able to stop the intruder).
Afterwards the police will probably show up to the scene to satisfy the requirements of their paperwork and to investigate you to determine if you are "respectable" (read white and rich) enough for them to follow up on your case. Even if you make the cut (I didn't) they are unlikely to find the intruder. If they DO find them, then you're free to consider whether you are in some way responsible for the actions of the police at that point; its a big IF by the way...
Personally I would try and help them; what kind of an asshole wouldn't? What would you do?
ETA: [img]biggrin.gif" border="0[/img] Stargazer, I think we'd both better find something else to do with our time!
[ 25 July 2008: Message edited by: It's Me D ]
As I heard the glass break, when they threw a propane tank through it, I met them with a loaded rifle in their faces, as they tried to enter, after undoing the lock through the broken glass in the door. They ran, and I actually fired a shot into the tree trunk as they were running past it. Interestingly, I was furious, but not scared.
But I had just happened to be downstairs, and in the room where the rifles were kept, at the time and do not know what would have happened otherwise though. There was definitely no time to call the police even, until after it was all over. An officer did come though and took a report and that was the end of it from the RCMP perspective and I ever heard from them again about it.
At the risk of being obvious, I'd call the police.
I'm not Chuck Norris. If you prefer the bare-knuckle approach, help yourself though.
Mind you, if we can all arm ourselves as remind did, maybe I wouldn't see disarming the police as such as foolhardy idea. In that case I suppose I'd stand back and brace my gun against a pole for good aim and take my shot. But once we're all walking around armed, I'd think we'd all be wasting a lot more lives than police with tasers or even police with guns.
Sounds like you were lucky. We certainly had no weapons in the house although the police were called within the first minute and arrived well after the intruders had fled (after the break and enter, assault, attempted murder, and robbery). At least you never heard from the police again (disgusting the better outcome!), my previous roomates have been harassed by the police ever since, despite moving, because we had the especially unfortunate luck to be consuming some illegal drugs when the break and enter, assault, attempted murder, and robbery took place; I guess the police found the drugs to be more important [img]mad.gif" border="0[/img]
Perhaps a significant difference between you and I: I consider myself to be significantly less murderous than the police.
But that is your position. If a cop violates the law, the right is always right there defending the violator - the criminal. Their is even a whole slew of movies glorifying police and vigilante murder. The right wing loves crime and criminals. It is why the right never has support for crime prevention but has all kinds of money for prisons where the right wing entertain their fantasies about male prisoners brutalizing and raping each other.
In respect to seeing someone attacked, today, in the cell phone days it is easy to make a call to the RCMP as soon as you see it. Having said that, I would still jump in and try to rescue the attacked person, even if I had made the call, if I thought their life was in danger. And I have done so in the past.
Is it? Or is it your imagination that it is?
Because not two whole hours ago I said:
I most surely support the disarming of any individual officer who abuses their power. Presumably, this disarming would be a natural part of immediately firing them.
How could you possibly read that an infer that my position is that criminal cops are OK? I mean, can you read? Do you have some kind of difficulty seeing all these funny shapes and making sense of them.
Is there any kind of policy around here regarding putting words in people's mouths? Yesterday I accused someone of endorsing a horrible thing because they accused me of endorsing a horrible thing, and surely enough, a moderator was calling me on the carpet for it in a flash, but nothing got said otherwise.
I find I'm spending more time responding to the things I've never said than the things I did say.
And I'm sure that for a lot of you the response will be "if you don't like it, go away". Ya, thanks for that. I'm getting the sense that you'd like me to leave. That's pretty clear. Does it occur to you, though, how many people watch you do your damndest to drive new members away if they won't mouth the same little oaths as you do? Do you ever wonder how many people decide that a clique like this just isn't worth their time?
Or is that just fine because you all are all you need, and anyone else is probably just a "troll" you don't need anyway?
-------------------------
And, also, Poland is extremely upset with Canada, Canadians and the ability of the RCMP to investigate themselves. It is high time that this self investigation ability was ceased, and it should become a political plank!
Nope. Let me look into it.
ETA: Judging by the remarks on the CBC discussion around the story, there are plenty of people who would like to kill the father as well. Kick 'em when they're down! It's really quite vicious and disgusting.
[ 25 July 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]
[ 25 July 2008: Message edited by: N.Beltov ]
They're just reg'lar fellas after all.