Canada blocks move to protect third world from deadly asbestos By: M. Spector (11 replies) October 14, 2006 - 7:55pm
- The Lancet slams Canadian By: Unionist (Dec 9 2010 - 11:32pm)
- Quote:Somewhere between a By: canuquetoo (Feb 6 2010 - 12:37pm)
- Charest pilloried over By: Unionist (Feb 5 2010 - 10:00pm)
- Re: Canada blocks move to protect third world from deadly asbest By: (Oct 28 2008 - 7:17pm)
- Re: Canada blocks move to protect third world from deadly asbest By: (Oct 28 2008 - 6:55pm)
- Re: Canada blocks move to protect third world from deadly asbest By: (Oct 28 2008 - 6:05pm)
- The Harpocons have done it By: M. Spector (May 23 2011 - 11:37pm)
- Re: Canada blocks move to protect third world from deadly asbest By: (Oct 15 2006 - 9:42am)
- Re: Canada blocks move to protect third world from deadly asbest By: (Oct 14 2006 - 10:48pm)
- Re: Canada blocks move to protect third world from deadly asbest By: (Oct 14 2006 - 9:45pm)
- Re: Canada blocks move to protect third world from deadly asbest By: (Oct 14 2006 - 7:55pm)
Ah, I thought it was a diplomacy, quid pro quo thing.
You know, either this stuff is dangerous or it's not. Pat Martin was on CBC radio being interviewed about it this afternoon. The list doesn't even ban this substance, just labels it as dangerous. There's little scientific debate that it is, even if it is less dangerous than other forms of asbestos.
I would suggest that a Gabon Viper is more dangerous than a Diamond Back Rattler, but it does't make the Diamond Back "safe".