babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

Are Inuit men sexual predators?

71 replies [Last post]

Comments

vaudree
Offline
Joined: Sep 7 2001
If I reminise about having sex when I was, lets say 16, is it the same as me thinking about two people who are presently 16 having sex.

If I think about two 40 year olds first encounter at the age of 16, is it the same as thinking about the first encounter of two people who are presently 16.


clersal
Offline
Joined: Apr 27 2001
Well, I hope I have now understood this. When we are sixteen and discover sex. Whoopee now here is a fun thing to do as often as possible.

At 40 it is still a fun thing to do among other things. Probably the fact of sexual security makes a difference.

We grow and change so while I remember when I was 16 I don't look back with the same eyes as I am not 16. Anymore than a 16 year old can imagine what sex will be like at 40.
Okay?


vaudree
Offline
Joined: Sep 7 2001
To put it a bit more bluntly - Is fantisizing about Alan Rickman or Patrick Swayzie having sex at 16 the same as fantasizing about Meades having sex at 16.

I know that the latter would be gross for a person my age, but what I am trying to find out is whether doing the former is OK or not or is categorized as doing the same thing.

For the record Meades, I have never had a fantasy about you, never plan to, and hope that you stay clear away from any adult who has. You are just the only one here that I could use to make the point blunt enough so that I could get a straight answer on it.


dale cooper
Offline
Joined: Aug 7 2002
Alan Rickman??

I understand your question, I just can't picture anyone wanting to fantasize about someone who is 40 having sex at 16. It seems like a very odd thing to do.


Mr. Magoo
Offline
Joined: Dec 13 2002
quote:To put it a bit more bluntly - Is fantisizing about Alan Rickman or Patrick Swayzie having sex at 16 the same as fantasizing about Meades having sex at 16.

Seems to me that putting your 16 year old "in the past" is just a little bit of jerrymandering to allow you to fantasize about 16 year olds and not feel like you're fantasizing about 16 year olds. That said, thought is always free, and there are plenty of worse things one could fantasize about.

(This, btw, is entirely different from remembering your own experiences at 16.)


clersal
Offline
Joined: Apr 27 2001
Now I get you. Okay I guess you hit the wrong person. I don't fantasize about other peoples sex lives, be it a movie star or Meades. In fact the sex life of a 16 year old doesn't interest me one sweet bit.
I guess I am just not ever going to be 'A dirty old Woman'. [img]biggrin.gif" border="0[/img]

vaudree
Offline
Joined: Sep 7 2001
What happened was that I started looking at that scene with Marg and Petunia and figured that it was Petunia that used magic rather than Harry so she was probably lying about not being a witch. Then I looked at Vernon being a real jerk and started figuring what would have had to go bad in her life to end up with that jerk. Then I decide that she attended Hogswart, dated Snape (Alan Rickman), dated Tom Riddle to make Snape jealous, things got dangerous and she escaped into the muggle world (violence against witches/wizards tended to be targeted and against muggles random). I started fantasing about Petunia and Snape getting back together as adults - nothing really bad just involving partial morphs and gillyweed that's all. And then I started thinking what kind of people they were and thinking that they would have had to have had a first time.

I used to fantasize about my first time a long afterwards but not really anyone elses. When I used to think of my first time, I didn't really focus on how old we were, but I knew how old we were.

Then I came here because I started figuring that I was getting in way over my head and might be crossing some kind of boundary, but I didn't know for sure. I do now.

The reason I started reading the fanflics was because I needed a break from the war and everything, which is why I haven't been around much.

Thanks for the patience. And thanks for the reality check.

[ 11 April 2003: Message edited by: vaudree ]


Sisyphus
Offline
Joined: Sep 21 2001
I think this paricular choice of thread title to begin such a silly discussion is in very poor taste, particularly given the content of the post that began this thread.

And in "Feminism", no less. [img]frown.gif" border="0[/img]


vaudree
Offline
Joined: Sep 7 2001
It's not silly. It is whether I went a bit too far and stepped over the line, which I think I did.

Just because this thread started at the other extreme where you are talking hard core pediphile who believe nothing is over the line.

The possiblilty that pediphilia is associated primarily with any particular group I think was refuted pretty early in that thread. End of what I have to say.


Timebandit
Offline
Joined: Sep 25 2001
Vaudree, you'd be better off starting a new thread. Your question has nothing to do with the topic at hand, and, as Sisyphus has pointed out, you are trivializing the content of the thread and its initial post.

Maybe in Banter?


writer
Offline
Joined: Apr 11 2002
rape, race, silencing

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments