babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

Boisclair's big gaffe

Joel_Goldenberg
Offline
Joined: May 5 2004
 

Comments

Joel_Goldenberg
Offline
Joined: May 5 2004
PQ leader Andrй Boisclair, it is reported, referred to some of his former Harvard fellow students as having "slanted eyes".

Globe and Mail

[ 15 March 2007: Message edited by: Joel_Goldenberg ]


ohara
Offline
Joined: Jan 20 2005
Yes and it seems that is about the only report Ive seen. Is it being pilloried in Quebec as it should? Is Boisclair finally being exposed for this racist comment?

Joel_Goldenberg
Offline
Joined: May 5 2004
quote:Originally posted by ohara:
Yes and it seems that is about the only report Ive seen.

I actually first heard about it on the radio this morning.


Catchfire
Offline
Joined: Apr 16 2003
La Presse glosses the alleged statement
quote:Il a prйvenu les jeunes qu'ils auraient а travailler dans une monde transformй, en concurrence avec des pays а l'йconomie йmergente. Il les a mis en garde contre l'idйe que les pays de l'Asie n'йtaient bons que pour les sweat shops. Il a racontй que lors de ses йtudes а Boston, il a vu beaucoup d'йtudiants en provenance de Chine et des Indes. «S'ils viennent йtudier aux Йtats-Unis, ce n'est pas pour travailler dans des sweat shops. Moi, j'ai le goыt de vous йquiper pour que vous soyez capables d'y faire face.»

As far as I can tell, Le Devoir did not report the comments at all, but concentrated on Boisclair's rallying call to separatists. I would love verification of this "gaffe."


500_Apples
Offline
Joined: Jun 3 2006
According to the globe and mail:

quote:MONTREAL -- Parti Quйbйcois Leader Andrй Boisclair said during a speech on global competitiveness that he was surprised to see so many students "with slanted eyes" when he was studying at Harvard University.
...
"When I was at Harvard, where I spent a year, I was surprised to see that on campus, about a third of the undergraduate students had slanted eyes," he said to a large classroom packed with students. He went on to say that 80,000 students from India and 60,000 from China study in the United States yearly.

K, whatever. He's making a description. Most Canadians if they went to a US city, would be surprised at how many blacks and hispanics there are. When judging whether or not someone is a racist asshole, try and make an effort to gauge their intentions rather than judging them based on your local definitions of political corectness. These definitions, I might add, likely they don't apply in another jusisdiction where the vocabulary is different. His intention here, I believe, is to point out how much more worldly higher education is than one might get the impression of from Quebec universities. And by the way, I'm not a fan of Boisclair. I just think it's lame to attack him on strawmen of political corectness that are specific to the political language of English north america.

The perfect analogy: it's like if an ignorant person went to Zimbabwe, and said they were surprised to see so many people with really curly hair.

***

Though, however, I still think Boisclair is ignorant, not because he said slanted eyes instead of southeast asian, but because he was actually surprised by the fact there were so many asians on American campuses. It reminds me of a point from Pierre Trudeau's biography. When he went to Harvard, he was surprised that perfectly reasonable human beings could support the second world war effort.


Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005
I can't believe this thread. What if he had said he was surprised to see so many students of colour? Or "visible minorities"? or women? Or older students? Or students with disabilities? Would that not be equally offensive (or not)?

What offends me, FWIW, is his neo-liberal globalization nonsense about how we have to be ready to "compete" with the clever amibitious young people of foreign lands.

Funny that some of the above posters don't find that notion offensive. Different world outlooks, I guess.


Joel_Goldenberg
Offline
Joined: May 5 2004
quote:Originally posted by unionist:
I can't believe this thread. What if he had said he was surprised to see so many students of colour? Or "visible minorities"? or women? Or older students? Or students with disabilities? Would that not be equally offensive (or not)?

Didn't Prince Phillip make a mocking gesture a while ago by slanting his eyes? Seems that would be pretty offensive.

[ 15 March 2007: Message edited by: Joel_Goldenberg ]


Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005
quote:Originally posted by Joel_Goldenberg:

Didn't Prince Phillip make a mocking gesture a while ago by slanting his eyes? Seems that would be pretty offensive.

Joel, three things:

1. There are people who have what some of us call "slanted eyes". This is not mockery. It's a fact. It's got to do with epicanthic folds, if memory serves.

2. I didn't understand Boisclair to have been mocking anyone. He didn't appear in blackface, for instance (which might have been the equivalent of what the Duke of Edinburgh did). And I still haven't seen the original French version of what he said, so I can't judge whether he used some offensive term (kinda doubt it) or just a descriptive one, like "students in wheelchairs".

3. What do you think of the point he was making (see my post above) - the one that I truly found offensive - that is, pitting our youth against the youth of emerging countries in Asia?


Joel_Goldenberg
Offline
Joined: May 5 2004
Well, the quote itself...

"They're not going to work in sweatshops. They're people who will later work as engineers, managers, and will create wealth. They're people who will innovate in their countries. There is ferocious competition in the world today."


... sounds comparatively benign, as if he is just stating a fact.


Joel_Goldenberg
Offline
Joined: May 5 2004
quote:Originally posted by unionist:

1. There are people who have what some of us call "slanted eyes". This is not mockery. It's a fact. It's got to do with epicanthic folds, if memory serves.

Sure it's a fact., but why use it in a speech? I don't know if one thing has anything to do with the other, but isn't Trois Riviиres close to Herouxville, and isn't the PQ trying to woo back potential ADQ votes from the region, the same ADQ whose party leader has made controversial statements about reasonable accommodation?

Actually, I was even more offended by Boisclair's reference to the "Eaton's fat English lady" quote.
'You didn't live through that," he is quoted as telling the students.
I don't think he did either, I think he's too young. Then again, maybe he can cite a personal incident. Or maybe it was just the sight of English on signs that incensed him.


Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005
quote:Originally posted by Joel_Goldenberg:
Well, the quote itself...

"They're not going to work in sweatshops. They're people who will later work as engineers, managers, and will create wealth. They're people who will innovate in their countries. There is ferocious competition in the world today."


... sounds comparatively benign, as if he is just stating a fact.

You really don't get it, because you and I don't share the same view of the world. I am not in competition with the workers of other countries.


Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005
quote:Originally posted by Joel_Goldenberg:

Actually, I was even more offended by Boisclair's reference to the "Eaton's fat English lady" quote.

Well, according to the Globe article, he didn't say "fat" - you did. I know the apocryphal story you're talking about. Surely Boisclair is talking about a (thankfully long past) time when a French-speaking Quebecker could neither get a job at Eaton's nor be served in French.

What's offensive about that? It was the reality until the 1970s.

ETA: I did find a reference to the "fat lady" today, but not in Boisclair's speech - it was in an English-language Montrйal newspaper called The Suburban:

quote:The real battleground is the disproportionally over-represented regions, and the Charest government’s main priority at the moment is to get its lame keister re-elected. Charest can never appear to be beholden to the suburbs where the fat lady from Eaton’s is purported to have retired.
[emphasis added]

Shame.

[ 15 March 2007: Message edited by: unionist ]


Joel_Goldenberg
Offline
Joined: May 5 2004
Here's another reference

"The "fat, damned English lady" at the counter in Eaton's who was unable to speak French, became the symbol of every store clerk, bank teller, construction foreman, plant manager, or taxi driver who at some point insulted or humiliated a francophone by not speaking their language. "

[ 15 March 2007: Message edited by: Joel_Goldenberg ]


Joel_Goldenberg
Offline
Joined: May 5 2004

Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005
ETA:

Here, I found it. "Grosses maudites anglaises" comes from an infamous speech by Liberal minister Pierre MacDonald in 1989:

CBC Archives

[ 15 March 2007: Message edited by: unionist ]


Joel_Goldenberg
Offline
Joined: May 5 2004
I've been trying to find the oiginal source. Wasn't it a former Quebec Liberal cabinet minister?

Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005
quote:Originally posted by Joel_Goldenberg:
I've been trying to find the oiginal source. Wasn't it a former Quebec Liberal cabinet minister?

We cross-posted - see my post above - you're right.

If Boisclair's reference was to that, then he's a bigger asshole than I thought.

Anyway, he never had my vote!

ETA: Still, do you think it's appropriate for the Suburban to keep this alive??

[ 15 March 2007: Message edited by: unionist ]


Joel_Goldenberg
Offline
Joined: May 5 2004
Ah, success, from the Feb. 15, 2007 Le Devoir

"Dиs les premiers jours de la campagne de 1985, il йtait immйdiatement apparu que le vice-prйsident de la Banque de Montrйal, Pierre MacDonald, prйsentй comme une grande vedette du futur gouvernement Bourassa, йtait un sujet trиs prometteur.

Le jour de l'annonce de sa candidature dans Robert-Baldwin, il avait fait blкmir son chef en dйclarant sur un ton catйgorique qu'il йtait impossible pour un nouveau gouvernement de prйsenter un budget dix jours aprиs son йlection, comme M. Bourassa s'y йtait prйcisйment engagй. En pleine crise linguistique, il avait tout de mкme йtй assez йtonnant de le voir raviver le souvenir des «grosses maudites Anglaises de chez Eaton».grosses maudites Anglaises de chez Eaton

Ah, I see we cross-posted again. Oh well.. [img]wink.gif" border="0[/img]

[ 15 March 2007: Message edited by: Joel_Goldenberg ]


Joel_Goldenberg
Offline
Joined: May 5 2004
quote:Originally posted by unionist:

We cross-posted - see my post above - you're right.

If Boisclair's reference was to that, then he's a bigger asshole than I thought.

Anyway, he never had my vote!

ETA: Still, do you think it's appropriate for the Suburban to keep this alive??

[ 15 March 2007: Message edited by: unionist ]

That was an editorial from a fair while ago, I believe. But that quote has been bouncing around for years. Just a shame Boisclair has to revive it, at least in part, to create an "us versus them" attitude.


Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005
quote:Originally posted by Joel_Goldenberg:

That was an editorial from a fair while ago, I believe.

Actually, it's entitled "Opinion — Texas hold 'em Liberal-style", by Anthony Bonaparte, and given the content, it was written in the past few days. Can't really tell the date, because somehow the site puts "March 15, 2007" on everything...

quote:But that quote has been bouncing around for years. Just a shame Boisclair has to revive it, at least in part, to create an "us versus them" attitude.

On that - after some reflection - I must agree with you.

[ 15 March 2007: Message edited by: unionist ]


Joel_Goldenberg
Offline
Joined: May 5 2004
Well, I can see how I thought the article was from a while ago (actually, it's an op-ed piece), its style is similar to that of our former editor Jim Duff, and that's a compliment to Anthony Bonaparte, who is is also our cartoonist and editorial coordinator.

robbie_dee
Offline
Joined: Apr 20 2001
Montreal Gazette: Boisclair won't apologize for "slant-eyes" remark (3-15-07)

quote:MONTREAL (CP) - A Montreal race relations group is calling on Parti Quebecois Leader Andre Boisclair to apologize for a remark he made about Asians.

But Boisclair refused to apologize Thursday for having referred to Asian students as having "slanting eyes." "I have no intention of apologizing," he replied when asked what he meant by his choice of words. The PQ leader, who was campaigning in Quebec City, said it's a term he uses frequently.

Boisclair was speaking to students on Wednesday about his studies at Harvard when he made the remark.

[ 15 March 2007: Message edited by: robbie_dee ]


Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005
Fo Niemi is a good fighter, but what a diversionary minor issue for him to seize upon.

At least Boisclair has managed to distract attention away from a much bigger potential scandal - the outlandish headgear he sported for his chamber of commerce speech:


robbie_dee
Offline
Joined: Apr 20 2001
From the article, at least, it sounds like Fo Niemi had the right perspective, but the PQ's response may be what helped blow this up:

quote:Fo Niemi of the Centre for Research-Action on Race Relations said Thursday the remark is offensive.

"It's a racist stereotype," said Niemi, who is of Asian heritage.

Niemi said he knows Boisclair and he believes the PQ leader is sensitive to racial issues and that he just made a slip of the tongue.

But Niemi said a party official contacted after the speech insisted there was nothing wrong with the description of Asians.

"She was very aggressive and confrontational," Niemi said. "Basically, she said 'What's the problem?'"


Maysie
Online
Joined: Apr 21 2005
Okay. Well. I can't believe I have to say this.

Referring to Asians as people with "slanted eyes" is racist.


pookie
Offline
Joined: Dec 13 2005
It's also quite damning that he assumes that they are all foreign students.

What an idiot.


robbie_dee
Offline
Joined: Apr 20 2001
I wonder if this is in any way a deliberate attempt to court the "racist shithead" vote that has been drifting towards Mario Dumont?

Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005
quote:Originally posted by bigcitygal:
Okay. Well. I can't believe I have to say this.

Referring to Asians as people with "slanted eyes" is racist.

But referring to them as "visible minorities" is not? Why don't you wait until you see what words he actually used? I haven't seen them quoted yet.


Unionist
Offline
Joined: Dec 11 2005
quote:Originally posted by robbie_dee:
From the article, at least, it sounds like Fo Niemi had the right perspective, but the PQ's response may be what helped blow this up:

Robbie_Dee, the article describes Fo Niemi as being "of Asian heritage".

If that isn't stereotypical, I don't know what is!

That's like saying that I, you, Phil Fontaine, and Hugo Chavez, and Condoleezza Rice are of "American heritage".

As I've said elsewhere, all these terms (like "Muslim community") are used to negate people's national origins and dismissively conflate them into some "foreign" category.

Boisclair does it too, by suggesting that anyone of a certain appearance must be an immigrant.

All such terminology should be banned in polite discourse.


kropotkin1951
Offline
Joined: Jun 6 2002
I would love to see him try to run for office in Richmond or Burnaby or most other Greater Vancouver municipalities where around 50% of the population is of Asian descent.

I agree it is a racist statement and like otheres I find it especially revealing that he would presume they were foreigners. I guess there aren't many CBC's (Canadian Born Chinese) in Quebec. However having said that in China people of European descent are regularily referred to as Round Eyes.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments