Clayoquot to be logged?! By: West Coast Greeny (40 replies) August 2, 2006 - 8:47pmRe: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 7:36pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 7:13pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 6:55pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 6:48pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 6:21pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 6:12pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 5:58pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 5:39pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 13 2006 - 11:00pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 13 2006 - 6:02pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 13 2006 - 1:17am) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 13 2006 - 12:38am) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 7 2006 - 11:17pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 7 2006 - 11:04pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 7 2006 - 10:34am) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 7 2006 - 10:22am) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 6 2006 - 9:16pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 6 2006 - 5:47pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 9:44pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 8:11pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 8:07pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 7:58pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 6:44pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 5:27pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 5:07pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 4:20pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 4:07pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 4:00pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 12:18pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 3 2006 - 7:13pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 3 2006 - 6:43pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 3 2006 - 2:38pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 3 2006 - 1:54pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 2 2006 - 9:19pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 2 2006 - 8:47pm)
- Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Feb 27 2007 - 5:40pm)
- Quote: They took years to By: M. Spector (Jun 10 2010 - 10:40pm)
- Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 27 2006 - 11:36pm)
- Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 27 2006 - 9:03pm)
- Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 21 2006 - 9:12am)
Cynic that I am,the whole select logging scheme will not support the intentions attributed to Iisaak above.
I'm a former stump to dump contractor and a former Interfor contractor.I worked for MB in Kennedy Lake back when spars were wooden and men were steel.
There is no way single tree select can generate the employment indicated above or generate the volume required to attract the interest of a Weyerhauser or Interfor.