Clayoquot to be logged?! By: West Coast Greeny (40 replies) August 2, 2006 - 8:47pmRe: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 7:36pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 7:13pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 6:55pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 6:48pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 6:21pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 6:12pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 5:58pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 5:39pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 13 2006 - 11:00pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 13 2006 - 6:02pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 13 2006 - 1:17am) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 13 2006 - 12:38am) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 7 2006 - 11:17pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 7 2006 - 11:04pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 7 2006 - 10:34am) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 7 2006 - 10:22am) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 6 2006 - 9:16pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 6 2006 - 5:47pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 9:44pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 8:11pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 8:07pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 7:58pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 6:44pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 5:27pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 5:07pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 4:20pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 4:07pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 4:00pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 12:18pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 3 2006 - 7:13pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 3 2006 - 6:43pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 3 2006 - 2:38pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 3 2006 - 1:54pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 2 2006 - 9:19pm) Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 2 2006 - 8:47pm)
- Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Feb 27 2007 - 5:40pm)
- Quote: They took years to By: M. Spector (Jun 10 2010 - 10:40pm)
- Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 27 2006 - 11:36pm)
- Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 27 2006 - 9:03pm)
- Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 21 2006 - 9:12am)
How about a logging scenario where there are no roads to build(signifigantly cuts down on costs of the roads bridges, enviromental reviews of building those bridges, and setbacks from salmon spawning streams(very sensitve stuff in BC these day). Of course with no roads it makes it difficult for protesters to get in to block fallers from entering the bush as the nearest road maybe 20 km away thru some of the ruggest BC coastal terrain. Most importantly, the media is going to be dragging their feet slugging through the bush to find the logged areas to get out the all important media attention required to garner large support amoung the population. The logging company simply has 5 sites on the g at any given time, and should there be a problem in one site, will abandon that site for a season and chopter in the crew to another site. Welcome to the world fo heli-logging. It is a very profitable form of looging for premium timber(not the crap for the pulp mills. First growth timber fits the bill perfectly. This combined with a program blessing the harvasting practises of this selective logging from FN makes the challenges of enviromental orginizations just that, a major challenge. This warin the woods is going to be a very different affair as the last one in this area and a very expensive one if it is to be won.