Steppenwolf Allende
rabble-rouser
Member: 14076
Joined: Aug 20 2006

quote: Achieving certification under the Forest Stewardship Council.

This is all great in principle. The FSC has very good ethical standards.

[URL=http://www.fsc.org/en/about/policy_standards/princ_criteria/[/URL]

The problem is in the detail and its legal interpretation. It's also a matter of monitoring to see if that's what's actually happening in practice.

The Liberals wiped out the Ministry of Forests field staff in their first term. So who's to know what is or isn't going on out there.


Clayoquot to be logged?! By: West Coast Greeny (40 replies) August 2, 2006 - 7:47pm
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 6:36pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 6:13pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 5:55pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 5:48pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 5:21pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 5:12pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 4:58pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 20 2006 - 4:39pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 13 2006 - 10:00pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 13 2006 - 5:02pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 13 2006 - 12:17am)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 12 2006 - 11:38pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 7 2006 - 10:17pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 7 2006 - 10:04pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 7 2006 - 9:34am)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 7 2006 - 9:22am)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 6 2006 - 8:16pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 6 2006 - 4:47pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 8:44pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 7:11pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 7:07pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 6:58pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 5:44pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 4:27pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 4:07pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 3:20pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 3:07pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 3:00pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 4 2006 - 11:18am)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 3 2006 - 6:13pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 3 2006 - 5:43pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 3 2006 - 1:38pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 3 2006 - 12:54pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 2 2006 - 8:19pm)
  • Re: Clayoquot to be logged?! By: (Aug 2 2006 - 7:47pm)