Local Native leaders and their communities have to be on guard not to be used by multinational industries who *may* try to pit them against others, or more accurately, minimum environmental and labour standards, but I'd like to see some actual evidence for this in *this* particular case first. More research needs to be done here IMo, as I'd imagine all established forest companies have been responsible for shoddy practices if they're allowed to get away with it, question here is do the previous agreements still hold legal weight.