How long can Harper refuse to meet the House? By: Wilf Day (30 replies) December 1, 2008 - 1:42am
- Re: How long can Harper refuse to meet the House? By: Michelle (Dec 1 2008 - 7:23pm)
- Bookish Agrarian wrote: I By: Captain Obvious (Dec 1 2008 - 7:17pm)
- Parkdale High Park By: Captain Obvious (Dec 1 2008 - 7:14pm)
- Harper is claiming that the By: Frustrated Mess (Dec 1 2008 - 5:04pm)
- Re: How long can Harper refuse to meet the House? By: The Bish (Dec 1 2008 - 4:53pm)
- Bärlüer wrote: There's a By: remind (Dec 1 2008 - 4:48pm)
- Bookish Agrarian wrote: I By: Interested Observer (Dec 1 2008 - 3:34pm)
- There's a good article (in By: Bärlüer (Dec 1 2008 - 3:10pm)
- As noted I don't know if By: KenS (Dec 1 2008 - 12:25pm)
- aka Mycroft wrote: It By: ottawaobserver (Dec 1 2008 - 12:18pm)
- He will do what he can to By: Buddy Kat (Dec 1 2008 - 12:08pm)
- The pay equity portion of By: remind (Dec 1 2008 - 11:40am)
- I have mentioned it before- By: Bookish Agrarian (Dec 1 2008 - 11:02am)
- The day Harper prorogues is By: bush is gone happy happy happy (Dec 1 2008 - 10:37am)
- It would behoove the By: aka Mycroft (Dec 1 2008 - 10:01am)
- I have no means of keeping By: KenS (Dec 1 2008 - 9:44am)
- KenS wrote: It's not even By: Agent 204 (Dec 1 2008 - 9:32am)
- Re: How long can Harper refuse to meet the House? By: aka Mycroft (Dec 1 2008 - 9:17am)
- It's not even clear that By: KenS (Dec 1 2008 - 9:08am)
- Other precedents that don't By: Parkdale High Park (Dec 1 2008 - 3:25am)
- ottawaobserver wrote: ... By: Wilf Day (Dec 1 2008 - 3:18am)
- Captain Obvious wrote: but By: Parkdale High Park (Dec 1 2008 - 3:05am)
- Wilf Day wrote: From By: ottawaobserver (Dec 1 2008 - 2:43am)
- Does anyone think that By: NorthReport (Dec 1 2008 - 2:42am)
- Great theory. Any precedent By: George Victor (Dec 1 2008 - 2:45am)
- So Harper can stop the By: Brian White (Dec 1 2008 - 2:37am)
- From another By: Wilf Day (Dec 1 2008 - 2:34am)
- Re: meeting once a year, my By: George Victor (Dec 1 2008 - 2:17am)
- Well, I'm a historian, not By: Captain Obvious (Dec 1 2008 - 2:02am)
- Are you also sure that By: George Victor (Dec 1 2008 - 1:54am)
From another thread:
Great theory. Any precedent or authority for that being the Speaker's role? Maybe several centuries old, but you'd have to go back almost to the days when parliament was struggling against the divine right of kings to find a case where the prime minister thought he could dispense with parliament.
Divine right of kings. Stephen Harper. I'm not getting the distinction, Wilf ;-)
But seriously, the Speaker's role is to protect the privileges of Parliamentarians, as just about every candidate for the job said in their speeches the other week. I suspect he would be summoned to play some role in that circumstance.
One picky point to another commenter though ... technically the government did pass one vote of confidence, because the Throne Speech did pass on a voice vote on division right after the Economic and Fiscal Update. One point in the government's favour. But really ... a sitting of less than a month? With no Supply Motion adopted? I don't think that fits the bill for prorogation.