Coalition: Iggy going around it By: KenS (100 replies) December 12, 2008 - 8:47amWill Iggy turn down the By: Farmpunk (Dec 13 2008 - 7:51am) In the irregular party By: KenS (Dec 13 2008 - 7:57am) Stockholm wrote:
IF FDR had By: Brian White (Dec 13 2008 - 4:50am) We can speculate on Iggy's By: radiorahim (Dec 13 2008 - 1:55am) Re: Coalition: Iggy going around it By: Stockholm (Dec 13 2008 - 1:23am) Iggy supported Thatcher, By: -=+=- (Dec 13 2008 - 1:03am) And it is that attitude By: janfromthebruce (Dec 13 2008 - 12:00am) IF FDR had had that By: Stockholm (Dec 12 2008 - 7:06pm) The pundits on Newman's By: Boom Boom (Dec 12 2008 - 7:03pm) Thank you all for the very By: Hoodeet (Dec 12 2008 - 5:49pm) The Bish wrote:
Olly By: Hoodeet (Dec 12 2008 - 5:42pm) I think the NDP wins either By: Stockholm (Dec 12 2008 - 5:05pm) Is Iggy "left" or "right"? By: Sunday Hat (Dec 12 2008 - 5:03pm) Ghislaine wrote:
I am By: KenS (Dec 12 2008 - 3:55pm) Maybe there is a time for By: Brian White (Dec 12 2008 - 2:38pm) Olly wrote:
Michael By: The Bish (Dec 12 2008 - 1:37pm) Stockholm wrote:
If the By: JeffWells (Dec 12 2008 - 1:27pm) Stockholm wrote:
There may By: Boom Boom (Dec 12 2008 - 1:08pm) Michael Ignatieff wrote for By: Olly (Dec 12 2008 - 1:00pm) Paul Martin certainly was By: melovesproles (Dec 12 2008 - 12:57pm) Tommy Douglas once By: Stockholm (Dec 12 2008 - 12:52pm) Josh is right - Ignatieff's By: Ghislaine (Dec 12 2008 - 12:49pm) Look, I'm just telling you By: Stockholm (Dec 12 2008 - 12:50pm) Stockholm wrote:
I can By: josh (Dec 12 2008 - 12:31pm) He's the right leader at By: Buddy Kat (Dec 12 2008 - 12:30pm) Stockholm wrote:
What about By: josh (Dec 12 2008 - 12:27pm) There may be plenty of good By: Stockholm (Dec 12 2008 - 12:16pm) Stockholm wrote:
I really By: Ghislaine (Dec 12 2008 - 12:08pm) Re: Coalition: Iggy going around it By: Stockholm (Dec 12 2008 - 12:06pm) Stockholm wrote:
I really By: josh (Dec 12 2008 - 11:51am) I really don't see what By: Stockholm (Dec 12 2008 - 11:34am) Substantively not far By: KenS (Dec 12 2008 - 10:39am) Re: Coalition: Iggy going around it By: josh (Dec 12 2008 - 10:20am) I think your second By: KenS (Dec 12 2008 - 10:06am) The NDP is in a tough By: melovesproles (Dec 12 2008 - 9:15am)
- Iggy is definitely not in By: KenS (Dec 17 2008 - 12:23pm)
- Sunday Hat wrote: I take By: KenS (Dec 17 2008 - 9:51am)
- Unionist wrote: My By: Malcolm (Dec 16 2008 - 12:25am)
- sojourner By: -=+=- (Dec 15 2008 - 4:44pm)
- Ignatieff has reportedly By: sojourner (Dec 15 2008 - 4:32pm)
- Stockholm wrote: "Layton By: Highlander (Dec 15 2008 - 4:24pm)
- Liberals refuse to come up By: Sunday Hat (Dec 15 2008 - 4:15pm)
- "Layton should just admit By: Stockholm (Dec 15 2008 - 4:08pm)
- Re: Coalition: Iggy going around it By: The Bish (Dec 15 2008 - 1:52pm)
- The Bish wrote: -=+=- By: -=+=- (Dec 15 2008 - 1:44pm)
- -=+=- wrote: The coverage By: The Bish (Dec 15 2008 - 1:31pm)
- Layton should just admit By: johnpauljones (Dec 15 2008 - 1:26pm)
- The Ignatieff "media By: Stockholm (Dec 15 2008 - 10:16am)
- Re: Coalition: Iggy going around it By: melovesproles (Dec 15 2008 - 8:37am)
- Re: Coalition: Iggy going around it By: Stockholm (Dec 15 2008 - 1:39am)
- Oh. Long-standing feud. By: Coyote (Dec 15 2008 - 1:35am)
- George: Love your droll By: George Victor (Dec 15 2008 - 1:34am)
- Malcolm wrote: - Fourth, as By: Unionist (Dec 15 2008 - 1:15am)
- Unionist wrote: Coyote By: Malcolm (Dec 15 2008 - 1:07am)
- I see. "Taking on" Harper By: Sunday Hat (Dec 15 2008 - 12:47am)
- "That will be By: Stockholm (Dec 15 2008 - 12:44am)
- I am now more convinced By: Highlander (Dec 15 2008 - 12:36am)
- Stockholm wrote: WE HATE By: Sunday Hat (Dec 15 2008 - 12:34am)
- Coyote wrote: Unionist By: Unionist (Dec 15 2008 - 12:29am)
- Right, and join the liberal By: janfromthebruce (Dec 15 2008 - 12:25am)
- Re: Coalition: Iggy going around it By: Lord Palmerston (Dec 15 2008 - 12:21am)
- The number one rule for the By: Stockholm (Dec 15 2008 - 12:17am)
- Layton follows Iggy into By: Sunday Hat (Dec 14 2008 - 11:38pm)
- George Victor wrote: And By: Malcolm (Dec 14 2008 - 11:37pm)
- Unionist wrote: Why not By: Malcolm (Dec 14 2008 - 11:36pm)
- Unionist wrote: Why not By: Coyote (Dec 14 2008 - 9:42pm)
- Just want to add, If Count By: Mojoroad1 (Dec 14 2008 - 6:05pm)
- Doesn't mean the Liberals By: Tommy_Paine (Dec 14 2008 - 3:11pm)
- I'm with T-P and Stock on By: Farmpunk (Dec 14 2008 - 2:35pm)
- Nope, it matters nothing By: Brian White (Dec 14 2008 - 2:33pm)
- "Exactly Tommy. This is my By: Tommy_Paine (Dec 14 2008 - 2:22pm)
- Stockholm wrote: I hope he By: -=+=- (Dec 14 2008 - 1:34pm)
- Re: Coalition: Iggy going around it By: Stockholm (Dec 14 2008 - 1:24pm)
- I think annologies to FDR By: Tommy_Paine (Dec 14 2008 - 1:22pm)
- "I think Iggy is going to By: Stockholm (Dec 14 2008 - 12:31pm)
- Ugh, talked to my dad on By: melovesproles (Dec 14 2008 - 11:52am)
- Brian White wrote: I think By: gram swaraj (Dec 14 2008 - 5:21am)
- Yes-yes! The shortest path By: Fidel (Dec 14 2008 - 1:58am)
- "Of the three options By: Stockholm (Dec 14 2008 - 1:20am)
- The NDP hasn't said By: KenS (Dec 13 2008 - 11:51pm)
- The NDP's position is By: Sunday Hat (Dec 13 2008 - 10:31pm)
- I think the idea of "leave By: Brian White (Dec 13 2008 - 10:26pm)
- Stockholm wrote: IF FDR had By: gram swaraj (Dec 13 2008 - 10:11pm)
- Sunday Hat wrote: I take By: KenS (Dec 13 2008 - 10:03pm)
- Paul Wells put Harper in By: janfromthebruce (Dec 13 2008 - 9:49pm)
- Unionist wrote: Why not By: adma (Dec 13 2008 - 8:42pm)
- I think the new "straw By: Sunday Hat (Dec 13 2008 - 8:26pm)
- Sunday Hat wrote: c) We By: KenS (Dec 13 2008 - 7:52pm)
- Malcolm wrote: George By: Boom Boom (Dec 13 2008 - 7:27pm)
- Malcolm: - Indicate By: George Victor (Dec 13 2008 - 7:15pm)
- Why not just a Con-NDP By: Unionist (Dec 13 2008 - 7:12pm)
- If the Liberals bail on the By: Malcolm (Dec 13 2008 - 6:54pm)
- Boom Boom wrote: His dad By: Malcolm (Dec 13 2008 - 6:50pm)
- Please read the thread By: Sunday Hat (Dec 13 2008 - 5:52pm)
- Sunday Hat wrote: So, your By: KenS (Dec 13 2008 - 5:19pm)
- -=+=- wrote: Iggy By: adma (Dec 13 2008 - 3:42pm)
- If Canadians cared that By: Stockholm (Dec 13 2008 - 3:22pm)
- So, your theory is By: Sunday Hat (Dec 13 2008 - 2:45pm)
- The only people who care By: Stockholm (Dec 13 2008 - 2:41pm)
- Stockholm wrote: Voters By: Sunday Hat (Dec 13 2008 - 2:09pm)
I see.
"Taking on" Harper has taken the NDP from 18 to 12 per cent so, surely, doing more of the same is the path to government.