Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: johnpauljones (96 replies) January 13, 2009 - 7:19pmAgain Fidel, sanctions By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 12:43am) I think sanctions against By: Fidel (Jan 14 2009 - 12:40am) Steve Burns wrote:
As a gay By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 12:38am) Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: Steve Burns (Jan 14 2009 - 12:26am) Certainly true Fidel. But By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 12:33am) Again, Turkey was a By: Fidel (Jan 14 2009 - 12:04am) That has nothing to do with By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 1:13am) I don't believe in God, so By: Stockholm (Jan 13 2009 - 11:46pm) Precisely Stockholm. This By: Cueball (Jan 13 2009 - 11:47pm) 99.9% of the "arab lands" in By: Stockholm (Jan 13 2009 - 11:35pm) Quote:
Kurdsitan has not By: Cueball (Jan 13 2009 - 11:36pm) CUPE has an extremely By: peterjcassidy (Jan 13 2009 - 11:22pm) "Kurdsitan has not been a By: Stockholm (Jan 13 2009 - 11:23pm) This whole Sid Ryan thing By: Unionist (Jan 13 2009 - 10:35pm) It has everything to do By: Cueball (Jan 13 2009 - 10:39pm) "Kurdsitan has not been a By: Stockholm (Jan 13 2009 - 10:22pm) You know nothing about By: Cueball (Jan 13 2009 - 9:49pm) The fact that the Kurds and By: Stockholm (Jan 13 2009 - 9:38pm) There already are sanctions By: Cueball (Jan 13 2009 - 9:30pm) It seems that Syd has By: miles (Jan 13 2009 - 9:28pm) Will you join me in also By: Stockholm (Jan 13 2009 - 9:22pm) The exact parameters of By: Cueball (Jan 13 2009 - 9:21pm) Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: Stockholm (Jan 13 2009 - 9:11pm) Winnifred wrote:
I am a By: Cueball (Jan 13 2009 - 9:05pm) I have to wonder what is By: miles (Jan 13 2009 - 8:55pm) Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: Winnifred (Jan 13 2009 - 8:49pm) I don't agree with Sid By: skarredmunkey (Jan 13 2009 - 8:25pm) Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: Cueball (Jan 13 2009 - 8:16pm) Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: Stockholm (Jan 13 2009 - 8:13pm) You should start a thread By: Cueball (Jan 13 2009 - 7:56pm) Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: Stockholm (Jan 13 2009 - 7:52pm) Well you wouldn't would you By: Cueball (Jan 13 2009 - 7:51pm) Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: ohara (Jan 13 2009 - 7:44pm) I think Paul Moist is By: Stockholm (Jan 13 2009 - 7:44pm) Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: Cueball (Jan 13 2009 - 7:36pm)
- It is not just that-- I By: Sean in Ottawa (Jan 14 2009 - 1:39pm)
- Oh, for cripes sakes, Sean, By: Michelle (Jan 14 2009 - 1:38pm)
- Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: Caissa (Jan 14 2009 - 1:35pm)
- This is the most bizarre By: Jingles (Jan 14 2009 - 1:32pm)
- Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: Catchfire (Jan 14 2009 - 1:24pm)
- Catchfire By: Sean in Ottawa (Jan 14 2009 - 1:18pm)
- Cueball wrote: But its not By: Sean in Ottawa (Jan 14 2009 - 1:11pm)
- Individuals like Stephen By: Catchfire (Jan 14 2009 - 1:00pm)
- Catchfire wrote: What I By: Sean in Ottawa (Jan 14 2009 - 12:53pm)
- But its not a war. Its a By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 11:59am)
- "Moist's apparent collusion By: Stockholm (Jan 14 2009 - 11:42am)
- I suggest that reffering to By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 11:42am)
- Cueball: I hear what you're By: Michael Nenonen (Jan 14 2009 - 11:31am)
- Cueball By: johnpauljones (Jan 14 2009 - 11:22am)
- My understanding is that By: Stockholm (Jan 14 2009 - 11:21am)
- I think some people are By: M. Spector (Jan 14 2009 - 11:20am)
- Catchfire: It is true that By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 11:20am)
- Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: Catchfire (Jan 14 2009 - 11:12am)
- Exaclty. I generally By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 11:10am)
- Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: Michael Nenonen (Jan 14 2009 - 11:05am)
- Michael Nenonen By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 11:04am)
- Snert wrote: Quote: What I By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 11:01am)
- Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: Michael Nenonen (Jan 14 2009 - 11:00am)
- Quote: What I do know is By: Snert (Jan 14 2009 - 10:59am)
- What most Canadians feel is By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 11:00am)
- Moist has stated what most By: SCC (Jan 14 2009 - 10:52am)
- Yes, you did. And you can By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 10:44am)
- It is called UNIVERSAL By: SCC (Jan 14 2009 - 10:38am)
- Quote: I then went on to By: Snert (Jan 14 2009 - 10:25am)
- Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: SCC (Jan 14 2009 - 10:24am)
- Caissa wrote: Oh, Cueball. By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 10:25am)
- What I see is mostly a By: Catchfire (Jan 14 2009 - 10:11am)
- Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: Caissa (Jan 14 2009 - 10:08am)
- Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 10:03am)
- Oh, Cueball. I have stated By: Caissa (Jan 14 2009 - 10:02am)
- I think a lot has been made By: Catchfire (Jan 14 2009 - 9:59am)
- Caissa wrote: When maybe By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 9:59am)
- johnpauljones wrote: It By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 9:54am)
- Then maybe both of our hopes By: Caissa (Jan 14 2009 - 9:59am)
- I preferred "had", I By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 9:46am)
- "Had" she have read By: Caissa (Jan 14 2009 - 9:38am)
- Caissa wrote: Your By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 9:39am)
- I am glad to see that we By: johnpauljones (Jan 14 2009 - 9:26am)
- Your behaviour in this By: Caissa (Jan 14 2009 - 9:35am)
- And I frankly "would walk By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 9:02am)
- You still lost me at that By: Sean in Ottawa (Jan 14 2009 - 8:52am)
- Actually I was making fun of By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 8:53am)
- Quote: Cueball, I am By: Jingles (Jan 14 2009 - 4:37am)
- M. Spector wrote: Jesus By: RevolutionPlease (Jan 14 2009 - 3:09am)
- Jesus fucking By: M. Spector (Jan 14 2009 - 2:05am)
- Cueball, I am completely By: Sean in Ottawa (Jan 14 2009 - 2:05am)
- Re: Paul Moist blasts Sid Ryan CUPE National vs CUPE Ontario By: cityprole (Jan 14 2009 - 1:55am)
- I think you could be right. By: Fidel (Jan 14 2009 - 1:53am)
- I see what you are saying, By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 1:42am)
- Okay. But my point is that By: Fidel (Jan 14 2009 - 1:35am)
- I am saying that Israel has By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 1:20am)
- So, Cueball, youre saying By: Fidel (Jan 14 2009 - 1:13am)
- Unionist wrote: CUPE By: M. Spector (Jan 14 2009 - 1:12am)
- No Fidel. The core economy By: Cueball (Jan 14 2009 - 1:07am)
- The president of the By: M. Spector (Jan 14 2009 - 12:55am)
- So what exists now is an By: Fidel (Jan 14 2009 - 12:51am)
CUPE National has taken a strong and honourable stand on the Gaza issue, as refected in Paul Moist's letter to Harper which I cited to open this thread.
Are you kidding me? Moist doesn't even call for an end to the Israeli occupation of Gaza - just a "ceasefire and a renewed commitment to the pursuit of peace"! He is careful to condemn "all acts of violence in the Middle East, including the Hamas rockets being launched into Israel and the Israeli offensive."
Strong and honourable? I think not. This is a mealy-mouthed, pox-on-both-sides, NDP-type statement.
Moist does not support the cause of the Palestinians. His refusal to support the boycott campaign is no mere "tactical" difference - it is a political one. Sid Ryan understands that.
The letter you posted by Denis Lemelin of CUPW is miles away better than Moist's.