Brian White
rabble-rouser-machine
Member: 9013
Joined: Jan 26 2005

Actually  Pro Rep is something that the NDP in general claim to aspire to. 

" Not every New Democrat, nor every progressive, is convinced that proportional representation is necessary or desirable in all jurisdictions"

You use the word progressive out of context there. Where is Pro Rep  not desirable?

Coyote wrote:

The provincial sections are not beholden to the federal party on policy matters; nor is the federal party beholden to provincial sections. Both have the right to take positions in their areas of jurisdiction.

 Not every New Democrat, nor every progressive, is convinced that proportional representation is necessary or desirable in all jurisdictions. I happen to believe that it makes far more sense in the federal context than it does in smaller jurisdictions like, for example, Nova Scotia or Saskatchewan.

Regardless, the provincial sections, and provincial leaders, are not junior partners answerable to their federal cousins.


Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in the upcoming referendum? By: Brian White (107 replies) January 29, 2009 - 10:20pm
  • Naci_Sey wrote:The NDP is By: Fidel (Feb 5 2009 - 11:30pm)
  • As far as I can gather from By: Wilf Day (Feb 7 2009 - 11:52pm)
  • Naci_Sey wrote: Had MMP been By: Peter3 (Feb 5 2009 - 10:48pm)
  • Don't think that's clear at By: Naci_Sey (Feb 5 2009 - 10:20pm)
  • So Carole James is not By: NorthReport (Feb 5 2009 - 9:20pm)
  • A complete answer. Did you By: Naci_Sey (Feb 5 2009 - 9:00pm)
  • I'm curious what answer By: Fartful Codger (Feb 5 2009 - 8:51pm)
  • From a blog post I wrote By: Naci_Sey (Feb 5 2009 - 8:33pm)
  • It is kinda funny that By: Brian White (Feb 5 2009 - 8:07pm)
  • Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: V. Jara (Feb 3 2009 - 2:49am)
  • theleftyinvestor wrote: By: Wilf Day (Feb 2 2009 - 11:12pm)
  • I think the trouble is that By: theleftyinvestor (Feb 1 2009 - 12:11pm)
  • Peter3 wrote:I'm curious By: Wilf Day (Jan 31 2009 - 10:13pm)
  • Peter3 wrote:It is not By: Naci_Sey (Jan 31 2009 - 8:44pm)
  • When Ontario had its By: Peter3 (Jan 31 2009 - 7:48pm)
  • Am a BC resident and have By: Naci_Sey (Jan 31 2009 - 7:12pm)
  • remind wrote:No, it is none By: scott (Jan 31 2009 - 6:33pm)
  • Which some people can't By: Coyote (Jan 31 2009 - 6:01pm)
  • No, it is none of the By: remind (Jan 31 2009 - 5:23pm)
  •  I think most of the By: Brian White (Jan 31 2009 - 4:52pm)
  • Wilf Day wrote:I don't know By: scott (Jan 31 2009 - 5:51pm)
  • I don't know whether Layton By: Wilf Day (Jan 31 2009 - 2:51pm)
  • Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: munroe (Jan 31 2009 - 2:45pm)
  • Brian White wrote:  Pro rep By: the grey (Jan 31 2009 - 12:52pm)
  • Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: Stockholm (Jan 31 2009 - 11:35am)
  • Some people cite Tommy By: Ken Burch (Jan 31 2009 - 4:05am)
  • What is the NDP "in By: Coyote (Jan 30 2009 - 10:16pm)
  • Actually  Pro Rep is By: Brian White (Jan 30 2009 - 9:22pm)
  • V. Jara wrote:I think it By: Brian White (Jan 30 2009 - 9:17pm)
  • I think it would be an By: V. Jara (Jan 30 2009 - 3:23am)
  • The federal party is By: Coyote (Jan 30 2009 - 1:32am)
  •  So they are not allowed to By: Brian White (Jan 30 2009 - 12:55am)
  • Has anyone seen By: NorthReport (Jan 30 2009 - 12:16am)
  • The provincial sections are By: Coyote (Jan 30 2009 - 12:04am)
  • Brian White wrote:  That By: jasonJ2 (Jan 29 2009 - 11:35pm)