Ontario NDP Leadership News

And the last question is exceedly stupid.

I would think that, with the onward march of the Greens,  popular sentiment around the schools' question last election, the rate of unemployment likely by leadership voting time and the possible position of the U.S. on the dirty stuff being shipped south out of the Tar Patch (we might know the fate of our "energy superpower" and its petro-dollar after Obama's Ottawa fly-by later this month), there will be lots to debate.

But, with what in mind? Polls?  A party in position to do something (anything) by the time of the next election, some moons down the road would be nice. 

The "economy/environment" catchall demands focus, specific proposals with the provincial budget and new industries in mind. What will be our main source(s) of energy if fossil fuels are out? How do we bring the new technology on stream - affordably. Budget in mind.

The person who gets up to a mike and  talks in generalizations about "green industry" must be laughed off the stage.

I just wish we were not saddled with the albatross of an anti-nuclear stance for power. Not when we are left talking vaguely and dishonestly about the price of power for industry and homes in a fossil-fuel-free world.

The Greens lie through their teeth. We cannot honestly go there and promise the worker of this province a competitive power source.

(Just trying to eliminate  that false dichotomy of economy/environment).

And very  frankly, if the  universal, seemingly timeless deceit that holds we can do it all without changing our energy ways is not corrected in March, I am going to give up a fight of some 35 years.

Socialist Caucus candidate calls for more corporate donors, lower corporate taxes.

 This is so funny it's easy to forget how ridiculous it is.

At what point did the Socialist Caucus decide that ending catholic education (and dividing the working class BTW) was more important than, say.... socialism?

The article:

(1)

Tanya Talaga
QUEEN'S PARK BUREAU

New Democratic MPP Michael Prue calls himself a "middle of the road" NDPer who hopes to recruit corporate donors to help dig the third party out of debt and he wants a frank discussion within his party on separate school funding.

Prue, the boy from Regent Park who grew up to be mayor of East York and then MPP for Beaches-East York, is one of four provincial NDP leadership candidates. He visited the Star's editorial board Thursday.

The leadership race will be decided at the NDP convention in Hamilton, March 6 to 8. Current NDP Leader Howard Hampton is stepping down but will remain the MPP for Kenora-Rainy River.

The provincial party is about $4 million in debt, and Prue said it needs to dig itself out to properly fight the next election. "We have to become more aggressive ... We need to do corporate fundraisers and $300-a-plate dinners – things we never do. We can't go into the next election with a debt."

It's time for an NDP leader from Toronto, said Prue, who feels his financial background as a former mayor gives him an advantage.

He would like Ontario to adopt an "enlightened" corporate tax policy that gives breaks to struggling companies about to lay off workers. "We should not be raising corporate taxes at this time. If we can reduce them to sustain or maintain business this would be the time to do it."

Oh, I see, you were referring to a possible floor fight to get a resolution on school funding on the floor.

"I would think that, with the onward march of the Greens,"

Hah! The so-called greens have been so utterly marginalized by the way the economic collapse and their invisible leadership in Ontario. If they are marching its with one gear for forward and three for reverse.

I have not heard a peep from the so-called greens since the election. Do they even still exist or have they filed for bankruptcy yet?

I used to be one of those on the Left that was just too enlightened and too radical to engage with the NDP (who in my mind were simply Liberals in a hurry). I certainly believed, and continue to believe that Third Way Leftism only makes sense as a Liberal conspiracy designed destroy democratic socialism. You see, once you concede that capitalism is the legitimate underwriter of democracy, you've effectively driven a wedge into the heart of democratic socialism.

So many like me would engage in social and political activism, striving for social justice and democratic reforms and at election time hold our noses and vote NDP. I will continue to do that, may even keep my membership active.  Around 10 years ago I decided to get active in the NDP. Donate, volunteer, etc... But my affair with the NDP is officially on the rocks. If the NDP (NEW DOOMACRATIC PARTY) wants to win my heart back, it needs to make a sharp left turn not sidle up to the Liberal mushy middle. Who are we trying to kid?

In the MSM we have have no advocates and no voice. This is why posting neoliberal inflected crap on here is disgusting. It's not because we are beyond reproach. It's because when you use their rules and their measuring stick, we will always come up short. At a time when the inherent contradictions of capitalism rear their ugly head, instead of calling out the beast, we shy away. We have become a laughing stock and pitiable. We have conceded the terms of engagement themselves and thus only look increasingly anachronistic and silly. The acrimony and vitriol, the faux indignation, the disingenuousness in these threads doesn't help.

My hope: After having tried to go down the middle road (what do folks think was the strategy of our last campaign?) and having had our butts handed to us, we return to being unrepentant democratic socialists; visionaries who live or die by their conviction that a better world is possible, visionaries who believe that true democracy and true socialism are possible, and that that can only be achieved democratically. We have nothing to lose, but a few seats. Most of our principles, our dignity, and our persistence have already been forfeited in our flirtation with neoliberalism. In my view, the middle of the road leads not only to our demise, but to our pitiable, sad, and undignified demise.

In the last two years, I have had two wonderful occasions to celebrate the NDP.  First, was listening to Stephen Lewis call out "capitalism" and implore the NDP to act on its democratic socialist roots. Second, was a mere couple of weeks ago when the NDP stood in the face of popular ignorance and stood up for democratic principle, education and the rights workers.  When was the last time you heard the word "capitalism" used contemptuously? That the NDP can't bring themselves to do so is not a mark of pragmatism but of shame!

 A smarmy, mushy, middle of the road leader of middling intelligence won't do it for me. And then there's the negative stuff, as if I needed more of a reason not to support Prue. That the handful of members of the socialist caucus somehow decided to endorse Prue defies explanation. I suppose it must have been around Prue's wanting to open up the school funding debate. It certainly couldn't have been based on ideological affiliation.

Here's a test: will Michael Prue say the word "socialist"? Go find some evidence.

I just find it amusing that a candidate who is proposing all of the things the "Socialist" Caucus opposes (cozying up to business, soliciting their donations, campaigning to cut their taxes) but they're backing him because, evidently, the biggest issue facing the working class is closing Catholic schools.

Funny, but not not funny haha.

P.S. Being steered by brokerage politics, where we move to the centre, let polls make our decisions for us, try to be everything for everyone, relinquish our democratic socialist heritage may well lead to, as is Prue's motto "results we've never had before". I'm just not in the same hurry to reach extinction as Prue, Horwath & Bisson are. 

I'm not advocating a regressive politics. Rather I want bold, progressive politics that refuse to forfeit our democratic socialist core. I don't want Liberals voting for the NDP if they think they can retain their neoliberal ideologies and assuage their guilt by supporting a party that cares about social justice. Moving to the centre is not the only way to become relevant.

I think the NDP could rebrand itself in such a way that it engages young voters again, in such a way the many Green supporters actually realize that they're really NDP'ers (many young Green supporters have no idea they're supporting a libertarian party; they want a party that stands up the environment and they also think the party stands for newer different kind of politics), in such a way that the "Left" feels enthusiastic about the NDP and thus begins to take a more active role in mainstream politics, and in such a way that Labour and the NDP become once again undivided partners in the fight for social & economic justice in this province.

I believe Peter Tabuns, in this regard, "is leading the way" to a bold NDP I could be really proud of. Like the other candidates (yes, Prue included), he's a good organizer and a very likable person. But, I cast my support as someone not affiliated with the Tabuns campaign. I've never volunteered or worked for his campaigns. Wonder if the other shills around here can make the same claim regarding their candidates of choice. In my view, Tabuns stands out in his intelligence and insight. He has proven and unmistakable Green credentials. Tabuns is more of a "leftist" than his rivals for the leadership. He has strong appeal for two demographics which should be a source for growth for the NDP: the urban and the young voter (ONDY we all know has endorsed Tabuns). Truth be told, my first choice is Stephen Lewis, barring that I'd happily settle for Peter Tabuns as leader of the ONDP.

I am all for having an open debate on almost any issue.  However, why is it I suspect that the forces wanting the NDP to back a single public school system won't accept the verdict even if the majority of delegates say thanks but no thanks.  No matter how soundly rejected -it will still be mytholgized as some 'backroom manipulation.'  I'm not saying resounding defeat is inevitavle, but if it does happen I predict that that will be the reaction to it.  I will have to see some kind of signal from some that they are actually prepared to have a debate, which by defintion means you might lose the argument.  At this point I am not all that convinced that those that say they want an open debate on the issue really are prepared to have one in which they lose.

Green party youth do know they are supporting libertarian ideas. A significant cohort subscribe to those ideas in part because parties like the NDP have not done an effective job explaining why the state has an important role.

Arranging for someone to get an endorsement by manipulating the process does not make for a legitimate endorsement either. Considering Tabuns has been campaigning for this job for more than a year, rearranged his office budget so he could divert his budget into hiring full time campaign workers and does not have it sealed up by now. That speaks volumes about his appeal.