Harper drops Cadman libel lawsuit against Liberals By: Dogbert (13 replies) February 7, 2009 - 1:26am
- Re: Harper drops Cadman libel lawsuit against Liberals By: KenS (Feb 8 2009 - 2:54am)
- Quote:What do you say to By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 7 2009 - 10:00pm)
- I have to agree that By: KenS (Feb 7 2009 - 9:56pm)
- Re: Harper drops Cadman libel lawsuit against Liberals By: ottawaobserver (Feb 7 2009 - 8:15pm)
- Re: Harper drops Cadman libel lawsuit against Liberals By: genstrike (Feb 7 2009 - 8:07pm)
- Wilf Day wrote: If this was By: ottawaobserver (Feb 7 2009 - 8:14pm)
- Re: Harper drops Cadman libel lawsuit against Liberals By: remind (Feb 7 2009 - 6:27pm)
- If this was the price was By: Wilf Day (Feb 7 2009 - 5:34pm)
- absolutely correct.Anybody By: fellowtraveller (Feb 7 2009 - 2:38pm)
- What do you say to people, By: remind (Feb 7 2009 - 2:23pm)
- Oh, there can be little By: Tommy_Paine (Feb 7 2009 - 10:54am)
- Re: Harper drops Cadman libel lawsuit against Liberals By: Agent 204 (Feb 7 2009 - 10:18am)
- Re: Harper drops Cadman libel lawsuit against Liberals By: remind (Feb 7 2009 - 3:18am)
If this was the price was for supporting the budget, the Liberals sold out cheap again. That lawsuit was a pretty sure loser, so Harper would have dropped it anyway.
Harper sued the Liberals for $2.5 million in damages, to which he later added another $1 million claim for injunctive relief (whatever that is; I'm getting this from the Liberal Party 2007 Financial Statements (PDF)).
People have assumed that the large amounts were intended to intimidate the Liberals both on the legal front and the financial front (given their precarious state at the time). I also wonder if it wasn't designed to scare off potential lenders or drive up the interest rate they'd have to pay to finance a campaign.
You're right that the case now looks to have been a loser for them, but if the Libs couldn't afford to defend it, or had to divert resources from other matters to do so, then it accomplished something for the Conservatives, don't you think? (Although, you're the lawyer, not me, Wilf!) The Conservatives sure applied a lot of spin after they got that partial report from the American tape expert, to try and force a settlement on the Libs.