Harper drops Cadman libel lawsuit against Liberals By: Dogbert (13 replies) February 7, 2009 - 1:26am
- Re: Harper drops Cadman libel lawsuit against Liberals By: KenS (Feb 8 2009 - 2:54am)
- Quote:What do you say to By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 7 2009 - 10:00pm)
- I have to agree that By: KenS (Feb 7 2009 - 9:56pm)
- Re: Harper drops Cadman libel lawsuit against Liberals By: ottawaobserver (Feb 7 2009 - 8:15pm)
- Re: Harper drops Cadman libel lawsuit against Liberals By: genstrike (Feb 7 2009 - 8:07pm)
- Wilf Day wrote: If this was By: ottawaobserver (Feb 7 2009 - 8:14pm)
- Re: Harper drops Cadman libel lawsuit against Liberals By: remind (Feb 7 2009 - 6:27pm)
- If this was the price was By: Wilf Day (Feb 7 2009 - 5:34pm)
- absolutely correct.Anybody By: fellowtraveller (Feb 7 2009 - 2:38pm)
- What do you say to people, By: remind (Feb 7 2009 - 2:23pm)
- Oh, there can be little By: Tommy_Paine (Feb 7 2009 - 10:54am)
- Re: Harper drops Cadman libel lawsuit against Liberals By: Agent 204 (Feb 7 2009 - 10:18am)
- Re: Harper drops Cadman libel lawsuit against Liberals By: remind (Feb 7 2009 - 3:18am)
I have to agree that [ultimate] loser or not, pursuing the case was of value to the Conservatives.
It didn't necessarily have to be a quid pro quo for the Libs voting with the government- more like a demand that dropping the suit would be a minimum good faith gesture.
Or to put it another way: they knew they couldn't expect to get a significant concession from Harper, but they should get something out of this, so....