There's still probably no God By: M. Spector (101 replies) January 29, 2009 - 7:31pmRe: There's still probably no God By: It's Me D (Feb 6 2009 - 12:50pm) Thanks for the By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 12:44pm) Not angry, just disappointed By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 12:41pm) Ah, invective and angry By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 12:32pm) Well I've read your notes to By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 12:35pm) Ah, ridicule and caricature, By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 11:47am) GONG! None of the above for By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 10:01am) The desire for immortality. By: Caissa (Feb 6 2009 - 9:45am) I find people tend to By: wwSwimming (Feb 6 2009 - 9:32am) Re: There's still probably no God By: Unionist (Feb 6 2009 - 8:47am) Catchfire:"Terry Eagleton's By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 8:44am) Re: There's still probably no God By: Boom Boom (Feb 6 2009 - 8:08am) Terry Eagleton's criticism By: Catchfire (Feb 6 2009 - 4:56am) Where we are going is off By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 12:39am) Not sure where you're going By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 12:09am) Yes, and the Church did By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 12:09am) "Why? Because their power By: Peter3 (Feb 5 2009 - 11:38pm) Peter3 wrote: The Bishops By: Fidel (Feb 5 2009 - 11:21pm) Fidel:The Church wasn't all By: Peter3 (Feb 5 2009 - 10:44pm) Michael Nenonen wrote:... I By: Refuge (Feb 5 2009 - 10:28pm) Peter3 wrote: I do believe By: Fidel (Feb 5 2009 - 9:57pm) Michael Nenonen wrote: The By: Peter3 (Feb 4 2009 - 3:25pm) Tommy_Paine wrote: "Do ants By: Fidel (Feb 4 2009 - 12:26pm) Michael Nenonen wrote:... I By: mersh (Feb 4 2009 - 10:59am) Didn't we have this sort of By: Unionist (Feb 4 2009 - 10:56am) Unionist wrote:Michael By: Fidel (Feb 4 2009 - 10:55am) Michael Nenonen wrote:Having By: Unionist (Feb 4 2009 - 10:45am) If people keep dragging up By: M. Spector (Feb 4 2009 - 10:43am) The ads seem to be founded By: Michael Nenonen (Feb 4 2009 - 10:00am) Quote:Halifax’s transit By: M. Spector (Feb 3 2009 - 10:16pm) The United Church joins the By: Doug (Feb 1 2009 - 8:39pm) "Do ants think we are gods? By: Tommy_Paine (Jan 30 2009 - 4:56pm) I have no problem with the By: oldgoat (Jan 30 2009 - 10:06am) Re: There's still probably no God By: Caissa (Jan 30 2009 - 10:04am) I have no problem with the By: Fidel (Jan 30 2009 - 9:52am)
- Let's continue here. By: Michelle (Mar 5 2009 - 2:42pm)
- unionist wrote: People get By: It's Me D (Mar 5 2009 - 2:24pm)
- Well yeah, I take people By: oldgoat (Mar 5 2009 - 2:10pm)
- Re: There's still probably no God By: Michelle (Mar 5 2009 - 2:04pm)
- oldgoat wrote:I can't help By: Unionist (Mar 5 2009 - 2:03pm)
- Unionist wrote:It's Me D By: Fidel (Mar 5 2009 - 1:57pm)
- Unionist, there's nothing By: oldgoat (Mar 5 2009 - 1:55pm)
- Unionist wrote:Before you By: RosaL (Mar 5 2009 - 1:54pm)
- It's Me D wrote:I know that By: Unionist (Mar 5 2009 - 1:46pm)
- Re: There's still probably no God By: oldgoat (Mar 5 2009 - 1:44pm)
- There's still probably no By: M. Spector (Mar 5 2009 - 1:40pm)
- Well there's this......son By: oldgoat (Mar 5 2009 - 1:35pm)
- Sven wrote:... when I heard By: Unionist (Mar 5 2009 - 1:30pm)
- What if God By: Doug (Mar 5 2009 - 1:26pm)
- Unionist wrote:Eagleton's By: Sven (Mar 4 2009 - 1:28pm)
- Pity about what happened By: It's Me D (Feb 9 2009 - 10:27am)
- Fidel wrote:I'm out'a this By: Sven (Feb 8 2009 - 12:11am)
- I'm out'a this thread until By: Fidel (Feb 8 2009 - 12:04am)
- Ah, Fidel, or Friedman, By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 8 2009 - 12:02am)
- Re: There's still probably no God By: oldgoat (Feb 7 2009 - 11:59pm)
- NOW the "Frustration" By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 11:57pm)
- Fidel wrote:You're full of By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 7 2009 - 11:45pm)
- GOD wrote:Don't make me come By: Sven (Feb 7 2009 - 11:32pm)
- You're full of shit as usual By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 11:31pm)
- Re: There's still probably no God By: GOD (Feb 7 2009 - 11:25pm)
- Fidel wrote:Frustrated Mess By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 7 2009 - 11:22pm)
- Frustrated Mess wrote: After By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 11:22pm)
- After all this time you By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 7 2009 - 10:52pm)
- Wasnt it you or a generic By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 10:45pm)
- Re: There's still probably no God By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 7 2009 - 10:40pm)
- Frustrated Mess wrote:You By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 10:33pm)
- Re: There's still probably no God By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 7 2009 - 9:43pm)
- Frustrated Mess wrote: I By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 9:30pm)
- Re: There's still probably no God By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 9:06pm)
- I can't think on decaf. We By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 7 2009 - 8:55pm)
- Hey why dont you two get a By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 8:47pm)
- Frustrated Mess wrote:Now he By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 8:19pm)
- Re: There's still probably no God By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 7 2009 - 8:16pm)
- Fidel wrote:Okay, I get it By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 6:50pm)
- Or how about these.Seven By: NorthReport (Feb 7 2009 - 1:43pm)
- Don't give up, after all By: NorthReport (Feb 7 2009 - 1:38pm)
- Okay, I get it now. Link By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 1:35pm)
- Fidel wrote:I wouldnt mind By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 1:27pm)
- I wouldnt mind your gentle By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 1:25pm)
- Oh, sorry Fidel, you wanted By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 2:37pm)
- Fidel, you shouldn't worry By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 1:15pm)
- Meanwhile, back at the ranch By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 1:34pm)
- Unionist wrote: the By: Slumberjack (Feb 7 2009 - 1:05pm)
- Perhaps unionist could post By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 1:10pm)
- The word "probably" in the By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 12:55pm)
- Can we have a By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 12:55pm)
- Fidel wrote:And Thanks, By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 12:44pm)
- And Thanks, unionist. It By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 1:07pm)
- Fidel wrote: their local By: triciamarie (Feb 7 2009 - 11:43am)
- I lift up my eyes to the By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 11:04am)
- due to a burst of light from By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 11:37am)
- Peter3 wrote: The By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 11:48am)
- Unionist wrote: I think By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 4:13pm)
- duplicate post created by By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 4:02pm)
- Fidel: Jesus wept (a By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 4:04pm)
- It's Me D wrote:Fidel thanks By: Unionist (Feb 6 2009 - 3:47pm)
- So what you're saying is, By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 2:50pm)
- Fidel wrote:Well now you're By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 2:02pm)
- Peter3 wrote:Fidel wrote: By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 1:32pm)
- Fidel wrote: That By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 1:16pm)
- Well here is another claim By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 1:18pm)
After all this time you still can't read. Oh, dear. No, it was not me. I merely expressed an environmental protest vote for the Greens.
Oh for Christ's sake. You posted endless drivel about carbon taxes and green this, green that and rabid attacks on the effective opposition NDP non-stop. For a party whose platform wasnt as green as the NDP's until a few years ago, they didnt have much else going for them except to pull votes from the NDP. Tories with composters, An-y way ...
Meanwhile, baaaaaaack at the ranch ...