Home
Fidel
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 6594
Joined: Apr 29 2004
February 7, 2009 - 11:57pm
#1

NOW the "Frustration" becomes evident. This idiot has finally realized that he doesnt subscribe to any of the views of the contributing columnists to Rabble. FM is so frustrated with the leftist ideas expressed on this site that he's resorted to steering this thread so far into the rhubarb that he really has no idea what thread he's in or that it even matters. He's determined to finally get his shots in on ol' Fidel, because I'm the object of his rabid disaffection with the left in general on this night. His warped view is that of a political chimera hybrid, something between a little red schoolhouse conservative and those people who think composting and free markets in hypocrisy will save the world

http://www.HeyMistaWeSureCouldUseAManLikeHoybetHooverAgain.us.gov 


  • Email this comment
There's still probably no God By: M. Spector (101 replies) January 29, 2009 - 7:31pm
  • Re: There's still probably no God By: It's Me D (Feb 6 2009 - 12:50pm)
  • Thanks for the By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 12:44pm)
  • Not angry, just disappointed By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 12:41pm)
  • Ah, invective and angry By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 12:32pm)
  • Well I've read your notes to By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 12:35pm)
  • Ah, ridicule and caricature, By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 11:47am)
  • GONG! None of the above for By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 10:01am)
  • The desire for immortality. By: Caissa (Feb 6 2009 - 9:45am)
  • I find people tend to By: wwSwimming (Feb 6 2009 - 9:32am)
  • Re: There's still probably no God By: Unionist (Feb 6 2009 - 8:47am)
  • Catchfire:"Terry Eagleton's By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 8:44am)
  • Re: There's still probably no God By: Boom Boom (Feb 6 2009 - 8:08am)
  • Terry Eagleton's criticism By: Catchfire (Feb 6 2009 - 4:56am)
  • Where we are going is off By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 12:39am)
  • Not sure where you're going By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 12:09am)
  • Yes, and the Church did By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 12:09am)
  • "Why? Because their power By: Peter3 (Feb 5 2009 - 11:38pm)
  • Peter3 wrote:  The Bishops By: Fidel (Feb 5 2009 - 11:21pm)
  • Fidel:The Church wasn't all By: Peter3 (Feb 5 2009 - 10:44pm)
  • Michael Nenonen wrote:... I By: Refuge (Feb 5 2009 - 10:28pm)
  • Peter3 wrote: I do believe By: Fidel (Feb 5 2009 - 9:57pm)
  • Michael Nenonen wrote: The By: Peter3 (Feb 4 2009 - 3:25pm)
  • Tommy_Paine wrote: "Do ants By: Fidel (Feb 4 2009 - 12:26pm)
  • Michael Nenonen wrote:... I By: mersh (Feb 4 2009 - 10:59am)
  • Didn't we have this sort of By: Unionist (Feb 4 2009 - 10:56am)
  • Unionist wrote:Michael By: Fidel (Feb 4 2009 - 10:55am)
  • Michael Nenonen wrote:Having By: Unionist (Feb 4 2009 - 10:45am)
  • If people keep dragging up By: M. Spector (Feb 4 2009 - 10:43am)
  • The ads seem to be founded By: Michael Nenonen (Feb 4 2009 - 10:00am)
  • Quote:Halifax’s transit By: M. Spector (Feb 3 2009 - 10:16pm)
  • The United Church joins the By: Doug (Feb 1 2009 - 8:39pm)
  • "Do ants think we are gods? By: Tommy_Paine (Jan 30 2009 - 4:56pm)
  • I have no problem with the By: oldgoat (Jan 30 2009 - 10:06am)
  • Re: There's still probably no God By: Caissa (Jan 30 2009 - 10:04am)
  • I have no problem with the By: Fidel (Jan 30 2009 - 9:52am)