babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

What Michael Phelps Should Have Said

Krago
Offline
Joined: Sep 9 2002

http://www.reason.com/news/show/131438.html

 

Tell you what. I’ll make you a deal. I’ll apologize for smoking pot when every politician who ever did drugs and then voted to uphold or strengthen the drug laws marches his ass off to the nearest federal prison to serve out the sentence he wants to impose on everyone else for committing the same crimes he committed. I’ll apologize when the sons, daughters, and nephews of powerful politicians who get caught possessing or dealing drugs in the frat house or prep school get the same treatment as the no-name, probably black kid caught on the corner or the front stoop doing the same thing.

Until then, I for one will have none of it. I smoked pot. I liked it. I’ll probably do it again. I refuse to apologize for it, because by apologizing I help perpetuate this stupid lie, this idea that what someone puts into his own body on his own time is any of the government’s damned business. Or any of yours. I’m not going to bend over and allow myself to be propaganda for this wasteful, ridiculous, immoral war.

Go ahead and tear me down if you like. But let’s see you rationalize in your next lame ONDCP commercial how the greatest motherfucking swimmer the world has ever seen...is also a proud pot smoker.

Yours,

Michael Phelps 


Comments

Sven
Offline
Joined: Jul 22 2005

Well, that may be easy for my friends at Reason.com to say, but they wouldn't be the ones flushing down tens of millions of dollars down the can taking a "principled stand" on this.

I say: Go to London, win five or six more gold medals, earn $50 million (or more), and then go on a road show, if he wants, and talk about how stupid pot laws are.

_______________________________________

Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!


remind
Offline
Joined: Jun 25 2004

So money, more than one can spend, laced with hypocrisy is more important than truth and principles?

___________________________________________________________ "watching the tide roll away"


Sven
Offline
Joined: Jul 22 2005
remind wrote:

So money, more than one can spend, laced with hypocrisy is more important than truth and principles?

Are you telling me that you'd advise one of your own sons or daughters (who might enjoy a little weed now and again) to walk away from (1) his or her career (that she or he has spent years of single-minded hard work building) and (2) tens of millions of dollars in order to: Embark on a campaign to eliminate restrictions on drugs? 

Hells bells.  The guy's 23 years old.  Make hay while the sun's shining.

_______________________________________

Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!


remind
Offline
Joined: Jun 25 2004

How many millions do you need? He already has gotten a boat load of millions, and as long as his drug tests come back clean when competing, there is nothing to prohibit his continued career wins.

The response he should have given is on the money.

__________________________________________________________ "watching the tide roll away"


Star Spangled C...
Offline
Joined: Sep 15 2008
Smoking weed didn't seem to hurt that snowboarder from BC who won gold several years back (though he briefly had his medal stripped) though he wasn't enarly as big a star as Phelps.

Michelle
Offline
Joined: May 10 2001
Excellent rant!  Thanks for linking, Krago.  Every word of it true, too.

Catchfire
Online
Joined: Apr 16 2003

Well, Ross Rebagliati claimed that he didn't smoke the weed. He said he was at a party where people were toking up 6 months before the olympics. Anyway, stripping the medal is a farce, since such an action suggests that weed is a performance enhancer. Not to mention snowboarding is kind of based on sitting around getting high before ripping down ludicrous slopes. It's like when the fashion world turned on Kate Moss after she was caught doing heroin.

 As for Phelps, it's not his fault the world is crazy. He's also just a kid, and an American one at that. And a jock.  Of course I agree wholeheartedly with the sentiment of Krago's rant, but all I've come to expect from my Olympic athletes are ringing endorsements for eggs.


Michelle
Offline
Joined: May 10 2001

And milk.  And clothes.


Sven
Offline
Joined: Jul 22 2005
Catchfire wrote:

As for Phelps, it's not his fault the world is crazy. He's also just a kid, and an American one at that. And a jock. 

Exactly.  And, so, I don't think he has any obligation, moral or otherwise, to change his entire life and go on an anti-anti-drug crusade.

_______________________________________

Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!


remind
Offline
Joined: Jun 25 2004

No one is actually stating that he should go on a crusade, people are actually stating that he should be honest and open, instead of being a toady and hypocrit to feather his already wealthy nest. Say nothing of the bad role model he is being, by lying and toadying for personal gain.

Did ya never stop to think think Sven, it is greedy self serving ideologies, such as yours, as  the root cause of the problems of inequality, injustice and human rights abuses? Well basically, I just should have said the root of all the societal ills of the world. No....I don'tsuppose you have, or you would not be espousing such, and think it is a way to be.

___________________________________________________________

"watching the tide roll away"


Sven
Offline
Joined: Jul 22 2005

remind wrote:
No one is actually stating that he should go on a crusade, people are actually stating that he should be honest and open, instead of being a toady and hypocrit to feather his already wealthy nest. Say nothing of the bad role model he is being, by lying and toadying for personal gain.

But, that’s exactly what he, in effect, would be doing, even if he only made a short, simple statement like: “I enjoy smoking pot, I think it should be legal, and I don’t think it’s anyone’s business what I do”.  That would pretty much end his career...even though that would be the extent of his "crusading".

I, on the other hand, think it’s perfectly legitimate for Phelps to do the following mental calculus: “Is pot smoking so important to me that I feel I must, as a matter of conscious, make a public statement advocating its legalization (and, effectively, end my career) or is pot smoking (and a right to smoke pot) simply not that important to me?”

remind wrote:
Did ya never stop to think think Sven, it is greedy self serving ideologies, such as yours, as  the root cause of the problems of inequality, injustice and human rights abuses? Well basically, I just should have said the root of all the societal ills of the world. No....I don'tsuppose you have, or you would not be espousing such, and think it is a way to be.

What you call “greedy”, I call personal choice.  I’m not apologetic for being libertarian.

_______________________________________

Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!


remind
Offline
Joined: Jun 25 2004

Well, if you do not have a problem with being the slime that is destroying society and the planet, and proudly identifying as such, I have no problem with identifying you as such, either. A win for both of us, it appears.

___________________________________________________________

"watching the tide roll away"


Sven
Offline
Joined: Jul 22 2005
remind wrote:

Well, if you do not have a problem with being the slime that is destroying society and the planet, and proudly identifying as such, I have no problem with identifying you as such, either. A win for both of us, it appears.

Are you having an unusually bad day?  You call me "the slime that is destroying society and the planet" based on, what?, my comments about Phelps?!?! hahahaha

_______________________________________

Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!


Michelle
Offline
Joined: May 10 2001

Oh come on, this is getting silly.  Of course we know he's probably not going to end his career in favour of pot.  The point of this article isn't to say that Phelps should have just thrown it all away.  The point of it was, instead, to make a point - that forcing this kid to choose between his career, or lying about pot, is hypocritical and stupid on the part of all of those people up in arms over his supposed "bad example".

Won't someone - someone! - think of the children?  Anyone? 


Sven
Offline
Joined: Jul 22 2005
Michelle wrote:

The point of it was, instead, to make a point - that forcing this kid to choose between his career, or lying about pot, is hypocritical and stupid on the part of all of those people up in arms over his supposed "bad example".

Now, that I totally agree with.

But, some, t'would seem, think that this kid should throw his career down the shitter and actually make a statement like the one proposed by Reason.com.

_______________________________________

Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!


Michelle
Offline
Joined: May 10 2001

Actually, YOU were the very first person in the thread to suggest that this was what was being proposed.  When it's pretty clear that the article is merely suggesting a fantasy statement that they wish Phelps COULD say.  It was YOU who brought the idea into the thread that the author of this article and everyone who agrees with the sentiment in it want Michael Phelps to become the new Pot Posterboy. 

Unfortunately for remind, she fell into your trap.  So, congratulations, I guess.  Mission accomplished!


Tommy_Paine
Offline
Joined: Apr 22 2001

Phelps could have and should have told people to stick it.    And, as far as lost endorsements go, there would be others gained.  

What a farce.  Rat out an undercover CIA agent, and you keep your job as a "journalist" in the States, instead of being charged with treason.  Smoke a little pot......


Sven
Offline
Joined: Jul 22 2005
Michelle wrote:

Actually, YOU were the very first person in the thread to suggest that this was what was being proposed.  When it's pretty clear that the article is merely suggesting a fantasy statement that they wish Phelps COULD say.  It was YOU who brought the idea into the thread that the author of this article and everyone who agrees with the sentiment in it want Michael Phelps to become the new Pot Posterboy.

Really?

Is Balko's piece entitled, "You People Who Castigate Phelps Are Hypocrites" or is it "What Michael Phelps Should Have Said"?  I think it's the latter.

And what did I actually say in response to that article?  I merely poo-poo'd the idea that Phelps should feel any obligation to say anything of the kind.  Period.

So, how is what I actually said in my first post above even remotely "controversial"?

And, no, contrary to how YOU characterized my post, I did not say that "everyone who agrees with the sentiment" thinks Phelps should be the Pot Posterboy.  What did I actually say?  I didn't "attack" anyone and specifically only referred to "my friends at Reason.com".

Please stop defending remind's boorish behavior.

_______________________________________

Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!


remind
Offline
Joined: Jun 25 2004

Nope  no falling, ;)  in fact, one might say he fell into my trap, of wanting him to show us all, yet again, what his character is, strictly for amusement's sake, of course. And he did so upon several occasions,  with many of his nasty facets, I might add.

___________________________________________________________

"watching the tide roll away"


Sven
Offline
Joined: Jul 22 2005

Michelle wrote:

Oh come on, this is getting silly. 

That's worth repeating.

But, I would very much like an answer this question, Michelle:

Sven wrote:

So, how is what I actually said in my first post above even remotely "controversial"?

I think the honest answer is: It's not.

_______________________________________

Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!


Sven
Offline
Joined: Jul 22 2005

If Jane and Joe Schmoe have to face drug charges over puffin' a little weed, I think Mr. Olympics should, too: County investigating whether Phelps will face charges for his naughty behavior 

_______________________________________

Eleutherophobics of the World...Unite!!!


melovesproles
Offline
Joined: Apr 15 2005
Charging Phelps would be purely symbolic, it's not like the US's drug laws are applied democratically.  They are all about the state having another club to bludgeon poor people.

NorthReport
Offline
Joined: Jul 6 2008

Olympics swimming star Phelps escapes pot charges

What a surprise! Laughing


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments