Pay equity - Canada moves back, U.S. forward By: martin dufresne (15 replies) January 29, 2009 - 6:26pm
- Dr. Dawg provides some By: pogge (Mar 7 2009 - 7:41pm)
- Michelle wrote:Is there any By: Bärlüer (Mar 7 2009 - 6:32pm)
- Refuge wrote: I don't know By: Refuge (Mar 4 2009 - 9:27am)
- The fight to keep pay equity By: martin dufresne (Mar 3 2009 - 10:57am)
- The punitive measures By: radiorahim (Feb 26 2009 - 12:21am)
- Here it is from the By: Refuge (Feb 25 2009 - 8:32pm)
- Does anyone have the exact By: Unionist (Feb 25 2009 - 10:48am)
- Refuge wrote: yeah, IMO I By: It's Me D (Feb 25 2009 - 10:45am)
- yeah, IMO I think that is By: Refuge (Feb 25 2009 - 10:32am)
- Re: Pay equity - Canada moves back, U.S. forward By: Stargazer (Feb 25 2009 - 10:06am)
- Michelle wrote: Is there By: Refuge (Feb 25 2009 - 9:53am)
- Re: Pay equity - Canada moves back, U.S. forward By: Michelle (Feb 25 2009 - 8:37am)
- The way our system works is, By: Maysie (Feb 25 2009 - 7:20am)
- So this means that a human By: Pride for Red Dolores (Feb 25 2009 - 1:46am)
- The more I think about this By: Loretta (Feb 15 2009 - 8:44pm)
So this means that a human right is now negotiable, and the onus is on the employer and the union ? There's no recourse ?
Also in light of this budget, I've been wondering why a person who is part time does not wualify for UI.