Pay equity - Canada moves back, U.S. forward By: martin dufresne (15 replies) January 29, 2009 - 5:26pm
- Dr. Dawg provides some By: pogge (Mar 7 2009 - 6:41pm)
- Michelle wrote:Is there any By: Bärlüer (Mar 7 2009 - 5:32pm)
- Refuge wrote: I don't know By: Refuge (Mar 4 2009 - 8:27am)
- The fight to keep pay equity By: martin dufresne (Mar 3 2009 - 9:57am)
- The punitive measures By: radiorahim (Feb 25 2009 - 11:21pm)
- Here it is from the By: Refuge (Feb 25 2009 - 7:32pm)
- Does anyone have the exact By: Unionist (Feb 25 2009 - 9:48am)
- Refuge wrote: yeah, IMO I By: It's Me D (Feb 25 2009 - 9:45am)
- yeah, IMO I think that is By: Refuge (Feb 25 2009 - 9:32am)
- Re: Pay equity - Canada moves back, U.S. forward By: Stargazer (Feb 25 2009 - 9:06am)
- Michelle wrote: Is there By: Refuge (Feb 25 2009 - 8:53am)
- Re: Pay equity - Canada moves back, U.S. forward By: Michelle (Feb 25 2009 - 7:37am)
- The way our system works is, By: Maysie (Feb 25 2009 - 6:20am)
- So this means that a human By: Pride for Red Dolores (Feb 25 2009 - 12:46am)
- The more I think about this By: Loretta (Feb 15 2009 - 7:44pm)
The way our system works is, human rights are granted by governments, and by that logic, can be taken away.
Obviously I don't agree that any given universal human right can be granted and then removed, but that is exactly what happens.
Pay equity was the law. It benefits all by increasing the wages of jobs that have been traditionally underpaid due to systemic sexism.
It *is* sickening what the Harper government continues to do with the full support of the Liberals.