Pay equity - Canada moves back, U.S. forward By: martin dufresne (15 replies) January 29, 2009 - 6:26pm
- Dr. Dawg provides some By: pogge (Mar 7 2009 - 7:41pm)
- Michelle wrote:Is there any By: Bärlüer (Mar 7 2009 - 6:32pm)
- Refuge wrote: I don't know By: Refuge (Mar 4 2009 - 9:27am)
- The fight to keep pay equity By: martin dufresne (Mar 3 2009 - 10:57am)
- The punitive measures By: radiorahim (Feb 26 2009 - 12:21am)
- Here it is from the By: Refuge (Feb 25 2009 - 8:32pm)
- Does anyone have the exact By: Unionist (Feb 25 2009 - 10:48am)
- Refuge wrote: yeah, IMO I By: It's Me D (Feb 25 2009 - 10:45am)
- yeah, IMO I think that is By: Refuge (Feb 25 2009 - 10:32am)
- Re: Pay equity - Canada moves back, U.S. forward By: Stargazer (Feb 25 2009 - 10:06am)
- Michelle wrote: Is there By: Refuge (Feb 25 2009 - 9:53am)
- Re: Pay equity - Canada moves back, U.S. forward By: Michelle (Feb 25 2009 - 8:37am)
- The way our system works is, By: Maysie (Feb 25 2009 - 7:20am)
- So this means that a human By: Pride for Red Dolores (Feb 25 2009 - 1:46am)
- The more I think about this By: Loretta (Feb 15 2009 - 8:44pm)
yeah, IMO I think that is the point of taking out the HRC for womens pay rights, we can "save money" at the expense of people that don't really matter to us anyway......stupid conservatives......and stupid liberals for agreeing to it.