Pay equity - Canada moves back, U.S. forward By: martin dufresne (15 replies) January 29, 2009 - 6:26pm
- Dr. Dawg provides some By: pogge (Mar 7 2009 - 7:41pm)
- Michelle wrote:Is there any By: Bärlüer (Mar 7 2009 - 6:32pm)
- Refuge wrote: I don't know By: Refuge (Mar 4 2009 - 9:27am)
- The fight to keep pay equity By: martin dufresne (Mar 3 2009 - 10:57am)
- The punitive measures By: radiorahim (Feb 26 2009 - 12:21am)
- Here it is from the By: Refuge (Feb 25 2009 - 8:32pm)
- Does anyone have the exact By: Unionist (Feb 25 2009 - 10:48am)
- Refuge wrote: yeah, IMO I By: It's Me D (Feb 25 2009 - 10:45am)
- yeah, IMO I think that is By: Refuge (Feb 25 2009 - 10:32am)
- Re: Pay equity - Canada moves back, U.S. forward By: Stargazer (Feb 25 2009 - 10:06am)
- Michelle wrote: Is there By: Refuge (Feb 25 2009 - 9:53am)
- Re: Pay equity - Canada moves back, U.S. forward By: Michelle (Feb 25 2009 - 8:37am)
- The way our system works is, By: Maysie (Feb 25 2009 - 7:20am)
- So this means that a human By: Pride for Red Dolores (Feb 25 2009 - 1:46am)
- The more I think about this By: Loretta (Feb 15 2009 - 8:44pm)
The punitive measures against unions assisting their members in filing pay equity complaints seem to be lifted from former Australian Prime Minister John Howard's book.
Howard's government made it illegal for a collective agreement to contain provisions that allowed workers to attend health and safety training that was put on by a union.
But in this case it's even more bizarre. Pay equity is part of the law. But unions seeking to enforce the law of the land will be penalized for doing so.
Iggy is going to let this whole thing sail through Parliament without uttering a peep.
And people thought Dion was gutless.