Stockholm
rabble-rouser-for-life
Member: 4138
Joined: Sep 29 2002

In reality, a merger between two parties that are of such mis-matched size - would essentially be a takeover. The NDP has 37 MPs, the Greens Zero. The NDP has over 100,000 members and MPPs and organization across Canada. The Greens have a couple of thousand members in the whole country and no organization to speak of. You can call it a "merger", but in practice the NDP would quickly become about 95% of the new party and we would be right back to where we were before the Green party came into existence.


Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: Center-Left Humanitarian (106 replies) March 1, 2009 - 10:30am
  • Wilf Day wrote:Center-Left By: Center-Left Humanitarian (Mar 2 2009 - 8:42am)
  • Maysie wrote:Oh, Centre-Left By: Center-Left Humanitarian (Mar 2 2009 - 8:34am)
  • Center-Left Humanitarian By: Wilf Day (Mar 1 2009 - 11:49pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 7:56pm)
  • If they shuck their market By: George Victor (Mar 1 2009 - 7:49pm)
  • But you see, George, that is By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 7:41pm)
  • FM:"Only the Green Party, By: George Victor (Mar 1 2009 - 7:13pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: mimeguy (Mar 1 2009 - 6:14pm)
  • Quote:The only party that By: melovesproles (Mar 1 2009 - 6:07pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: mimeguy (Mar 1 2009 - 5:50pm)
  • "they're listening"? By: remind (Mar 1 2009 - 5:15pm)
  • Quote:If politicians By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 4:53pm)
  • Stockholm wrote:"Coalitions" By: mimeguy (Mar 1 2009 - 4:46pm)
  • scarboroughnative wrote:A By: Unionist (Mar 1 2009 - 4:20pm)
  • Stepping over the poorly By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 5:48pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: Coyote (Mar 1 2009 - 4:00pm)
  • quite scary as are their By: anchovy breather (Mar 1 2009 - 4:00pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: scarboroughnative (Mar 1 2009 - 3:50pm)
  • George Victor wrote:And here By: genstrike (Mar 1 2009 - 3:49pm)
  • Don't get started on me here By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 3:05pm)
  • FM:"But nevermind the NDP, By: George Victor (Mar 1 2009 - 2:29pm)
  • Stockholm wrote:It IS By: Unionist (Mar 1 2009 - 2:20pm)
  • To those actually interested By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 1:55pm)
  • "Coalitions" are what are By: Stockholm (Mar 1 2009 - 1:39pm)
  • It IS simplistic because we By: Stockholm (Mar 1 2009 - 1:37pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: LeighT (Mar 1 2009 - 1:32pm)
  • miles wrote: What does the By: Unionist (Mar 1 2009 - 1:26pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: Stockholm (Mar 1 2009 - 1:16pm)
  • I know what the Greens would By: miles (Mar 1 2009 - 12:50pm)
  • The way I see it, the Greens By: genstrike (Mar 1 2009 - 12:48pm)
  • Stockholm wrote: Ou're By: RevolutionPlease (Mar 1 2009 - 11:14am)
  • Ou're assuming the Greens By: Stockholm (Mar 1 2009 - 11:02am)
  • thanks Maysie for By: LeighT (Mar 1 2009 - 10:52am)
  • Oh, Centre-Left By: Maysie (Mar 1 2009 - 10:29am)
  • I think it is possible to By: LeighT (Mar 1 2009 - 10:17am)