Stockholm
rabble-rouser-for-life
Member: 4138
Joined: Sep 29 2002

It IS simplistic because we know from past "mergers" that 1+1 never equals 2. A lot of people who voted green were Liberals who didn't like Dion, they will happily go back to where they came from now that Dion is out of the picture. Some were Tories who weren't crazy about Harper. Some were people who just wanted to register a protest vote by voting for a "non-party" if there is no green party on the ballot - they would vote Rhino. Then there are NDP voters who might think twice about voting for the "Green Democrats" if they think the party is now full f crackpots like Jim Harris and Elizabeth May!

The only thing the NDP would really gain would be having one less other party to worry about - and if there was no green party the NDP would never have to worry that raising the profile of environmental issues might also help the greens. But these are minor advantages.


Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: Center-Left Humanitarian (106 replies) March 1, 2009 - 11:30am
  • Wilf Day wrote:Center-Left By: Center-Left Humanitarian (Mar 2 2009 - 9:42am)
  • Maysie wrote:Oh, Centre-Left By: Center-Left Humanitarian (Mar 2 2009 - 9:34am)
  • Center-Left Humanitarian By: Wilf Day (Mar 2 2009 - 12:49am)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 8:56pm)
  • If they shuck their market By: George Victor (Mar 1 2009 - 8:49pm)
  • But you see, George, that is By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 8:41pm)
  • FM:"Only the Green Party, By: George Victor (Mar 1 2009 - 8:13pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: mimeguy (Mar 1 2009 - 7:14pm)
  • Quote:The only party that By: melovesproles (Mar 1 2009 - 7:07pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: mimeguy (Mar 1 2009 - 6:50pm)
  • "they're listening"? By: remind (Mar 1 2009 - 6:15pm)
  • Quote:If politicians By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 5:53pm)
  • Stockholm wrote:"Coalitions" By: mimeguy (Mar 1 2009 - 5:46pm)
  • scarboroughnative wrote:A By: Unionist (Mar 1 2009 - 5:20pm)
  • Stepping over the poorly By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 6:48pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: Coyote (Mar 1 2009 - 5:00pm)
  • quite scary as are their By: anchovy breather (Mar 1 2009 - 5:00pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: scarboroughnative (Mar 1 2009 - 4:50pm)
  • George Victor wrote:And here By: genstrike (Mar 1 2009 - 4:49pm)
  • Don't get started on me here By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 4:05pm)
  • FM:"But nevermind the NDP, By: George Victor (Mar 1 2009 - 3:29pm)
  • Stockholm wrote:It IS By: Unionist (Mar 1 2009 - 3:20pm)
  • To those actually interested By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 2:55pm)
  • "Coalitions" are what are By: Stockholm (Mar 1 2009 - 2:39pm)
  • It IS simplistic because we By: Stockholm (Mar 1 2009 - 2:37pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: LeighT (Mar 1 2009 - 2:32pm)
  • miles wrote: What does the By: Unionist (Mar 1 2009 - 2:26pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: Stockholm (Mar 1 2009 - 2:16pm)
  • I know what the Greens would By: miles (Mar 1 2009 - 1:50pm)
  • The way I see it, the Greens By: genstrike (Mar 1 2009 - 1:48pm)
  • Stockholm wrote: Ou're By: RevolutionPlease (Mar 1 2009 - 12:14pm)
  • Ou're assuming the Greens By: Stockholm (Mar 1 2009 - 12:02pm)
  • thanks Maysie for By: LeighT (Mar 1 2009 - 11:52am)
  • Oh, Centre-Left By: Maysie (Mar 1 2009 - 11:29am)
  • I think it is possible to By: LeighT (Mar 1 2009 - 11:17am)