Unionist
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 12323
Joined: Dec 11 2005

Stockholm wrote:

It IS simplistic because we know from past "mergers" that 1+1 never equals 2.

On the other hand, 1+1 might equal 3 - if a combined party looked more likely to achieve power. Like it or not, that's one of the biggest reasons people don't vote for third parties.

Anyway, I think my math is right. Let's test it.

From 1993 (the first election where Reform ran) to 2008, in every single election - except one, in 2004 - the PC vote plus the Reform (Canadian Alliance) vote was always around 37% - more or less the same as the merged CPC vote in 2006 and 2008

But under your logic, Stockholm, the merger should have scared off both hardened rightists and red Tories, creating a mass exodus. Never happened.


Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: Center-Left Humanitarian (106 replies) March 1, 2009 - 11:30am
  • Wilf Day wrote:Center-Left By: Center-Left Humanitarian (Mar 2 2009 - 9:42am)
  • Maysie wrote:Oh, Centre-Left By: Center-Left Humanitarian (Mar 2 2009 - 9:34am)
  • Center-Left Humanitarian By: Wilf Day (Mar 2 2009 - 12:49am)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 8:56pm)
  • If they shuck their market By: George Victor (Mar 1 2009 - 8:49pm)
  • But you see, George, that is By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 8:41pm)
  • FM:"Only the Green Party, By: George Victor (Mar 1 2009 - 8:13pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: mimeguy (Mar 1 2009 - 7:14pm)
  • Quote:The only party that By: melovesproles (Mar 1 2009 - 7:07pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: mimeguy (Mar 1 2009 - 6:50pm)
  • "they're listening"? By: remind (Mar 1 2009 - 6:15pm)
  • Quote:If politicians By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 5:53pm)
  • Stockholm wrote:"Coalitions" By: mimeguy (Mar 1 2009 - 5:46pm)
  • scarboroughnative wrote:A By: Unionist (Mar 1 2009 - 5:20pm)
  • Stepping over the poorly By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 6:48pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: Coyote (Mar 1 2009 - 5:00pm)
  • quite scary as are their By: anchovy breather (Mar 1 2009 - 5:00pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: scarboroughnative (Mar 1 2009 - 4:50pm)
  • George Victor wrote:And here By: genstrike (Mar 1 2009 - 4:49pm)
  • Don't get started on me here By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 4:05pm)
  • FM:"But nevermind the NDP, By: George Victor (Mar 1 2009 - 3:29pm)
  • Stockholm wrote:It IS By: Unionist (Mar 1 2009 - 3:20pm)
  • To those actually interested By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 1 2009 - 2:55pm)
  • "Coalitions" are what are By: Stockholm (Mar 1 2009 - 2:39pm)
  • It IS simplistic because we By: Stockholm (Mar 1 2009 - 2:37pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: LeighT (Mar 1 2009 - 2:32pm)
  • miles wrote: What does the By: Unionist (Mar 1 2009 - 2:26pm)
  • Re: Now is a good time for an NDP-Green Party By: Stockholm (Mar 1 2009 - 2:16pm)
  • I know what the Greens would By: miles (Mar 1 2009 - 1:50pm)
  • The way I see it, the Greens By: genstrike (Mar 1 2009 - 1:48pm)
  • Stockholm wrote: Ou're By: RevolutionPlease (Mar 1 2009 - 12:14pm)
  • Ou're assuming the Greens By: Stockholm (Mar 1 2009 - 12:02pm)
  • thanks Maysie for By: LeighT (Mar 1 2009 - 11:52am)
  • Oh, Centre-Left By: Maysie (Mar 1 2009 - 11:29am)
  • I think it is possible to By: LeighT (Mar 1 2009 - 11:17am)