Raphael Alexander: The left's moral bankruptcy on Afghanistan By: Interested Observer (37 replies) March 2, 2009 - 8:36pmMust Leave, will respond By: Interested Observer (Mar 3 2009 - 12:11am) Interested Observer wrote: By: Cueball (Mar 3 2009 - 12:12am) I will, but can't you still By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:58pm) Nothing encourages tyranny By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:56pm) Well, maybe that's the By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 2 2009 - 11:57pm) Frustrated Mess By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:51pm) Re: Raphael Alexander: The left's moral bankruptcy on Afghanista By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 11:44pm) Okay, what was it? By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:42pm) Quote:In the case of By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 2 2009 - 11:41pm) The latter. By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 11:40pm) yes, to which question? By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:39pm) Re: Raphael Alexander: The left's moral bankruptcy on Afghanista By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 11:33pm) There really is no definity By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:37pm) Frustrated Mess wrote:Quote: By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:25pm) In for a penny in for a By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 11:23pm) Cueball wrote:These By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:22pm) Interested Observer wrote: I By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 11:21pm) I agree that war is hard to By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:11pm) Quote: Do you see the By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 2 2009 - 11:07pm) These situations are not at By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 11:05pm) Yes, hitlers invasion of By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 10:32pm) Quote:The problem I have By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 2 2009 - 10:11pm) Interested Observer wrote: By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 9:56pm) Is it right-wing drivel? I By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 9:53pm) Okay, imagine this By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 9:45pm) By: Webgear (Mar 2 2009 - 9:19pm) Interested Observer By: Banjo (Mar 2 2009 - 9:05pm) Interested Observer wrote: By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 9:05pm) We could. Do you want to By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 9:00pm) That's a good quote you By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 8:58pm) Re: Raphael Alexander: The left's moral bankruptcy on Afghanista By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 8:56pm) It only mentions the harper By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 8:53pm) “Naturally the common By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 8:50pm) This really belongs in By: M. Spector (Mar 2 2009 - 8:44pm) FYI: There are hidden links By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 8:38pm)
- Raphael By: Fidel (Mar 3 2009 - 12:27am)
- Re: Raphael Alexander: The left's moral bankruptcy on Afghanista By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 3 2009 - 12:16am)
Is it right-wing drivel? I view it more as a centrist position, criticizing both the left and, although not enough in this opinion piece due to the nature of topic, criticizing the right. (I believe the author is conservative himself, however he disagrees with elements of his 'grouping') Or is the centre automatically right-wing since it's not left-wing? Can an opinion on an issue not fall into those categories?
Even if one were to call this a right-wing position, would it automatically make it wrong even if it were backed up with solid arguments and sound reasonable and realistic.
Labels are used by people who are too lazy or stubborn to admit they may be wrong and reinforces their own view out of egotistical necessity. (This description includes me of course, however I'm trying.
)
Brian Topp: Our friends on the blue team seem to mostly focus on sticks, and not so much on carrots. ;)