Raphael Alexander: The left's moral bankruptcy on Afghanistan By: Interested Observer (37 replies) March 2, 2009 - 8:36pmMust Leave, will respond By: Interested Observer (Mar 3 2009 - 12:11am) Interested Observer wrote: By: Cueball (Mar 3 2009 - 12:12am) I will, but can't you still By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:58pm) Nothing encourages tyranny By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:56pm) Well, maybe that's the By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 2 2009 - 11:57pm) Frustrated Mess By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:51pm) Re: Raphael Alexander: The left's moral bankruptcy on Afghanista By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 11:44pm) Okay, what was it? By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:42pm) Quote:In the case of By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 2 2009 - 11:41pm) The latter. By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 11:40pm) yes, to which question? By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:39pm) Re: Raphael Alexander: The left's moral bankruptcy on Afghanista By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 11:33pm) There really is no definity By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:37pm) Frustrated Mess wrote:Quote: By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:25pm) In for a penny in for a By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 11:23pm) Cueball wrote:These By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:22pm) Interested Observer wrote: I By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 11:21pm) I agree that war is hard to By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 11:11pm) Quote: Do you see the By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 2 2009 - 11:07pm) These situations are not at By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 11:05pm) Yes, hitlers invasion of By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 10:32pm) Quote:The problem I have By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 2 2009 - 10:11pm) Interested Observer wrote: By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 9:56pm) Is it right-wing drivel? I By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 9:53pm) Okay, imagine this By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 9:45pm) By: Webgear (Mar 2 2009 - 9:19pm) Interested Observer By: Banjo (Mar 2 2009 - 9:05pm) Interested Observer wrote: By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 9:05pm) We could. Do you want to By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 9:00pm) That's a good quote you By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 8:58pm) Re: Raphael Alexander: The left's moral bankruptcy on Afghanista By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 8:56pm) It only mentions the harper By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 8:53pm) “Naturally the common By: Cueball (Mar 2 2009 - 8:50pm) This really belongs in By: M. Spector (Mar 2 2009 - 8:44pm) FYI: There are hidden links By: Interested Observer (Mar 2 2009 - 8:38pm)
- Raphael By: Fidel (Mar 3 2009 - 12:27am)
- Re: Raphael Alexander: The left's moral bankruptcy on Afghanista By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 3 2009 - 12:16am)
Raphael Alexander wrote:
Linda McQuaig wrote:
The notion of the Afghan mission as a moral, legal war pervades the Manley report. Contrasting it to the invasion of Iraq, Manley portrays the intervention in Afghanistan as a law-abiding, UN-authorized venture. But [Francis] Boyle says that the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan were both illegal under international law, in that neither received Security Council approval.
The Manley report implies that the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan was endorsed by the Security Council, but Boyle notes that the Security Council resolution cited by Manley in no way authorized military action. Rather, it called for the perpetrators of 9/11 to be brought to justice – suggesting they be dealt with as criminals through extradition and the judicial system, not war.
Manley was a Liberal minister stooging for crazy George then, and Harper is a replacement stooge for the vicious empire with tentacles in Ottawa.
Raphael Alexander said:
Does Raphael even care that al Qa'eda is a US CIA creation? Has Raphael ever read about NATO's deep state involvement in perpetrating false flag terrorism in Europe and former USSR during the cold war era? Did his mama ever give him a colouring book when he was a child, the kind that have connect the dots pages?