melovesproles
rabble-rouser
Member: 9868
Joined: Apr 15 2005

Quote:
And, i hope that once the BC Greens strike out again in BC, the media consortium there will finally stop inviting the Green leader to be in the debate in their endless efforts to help Campbell get re-eleted.

Clearly, its all part of a conspiracy by the media consortium to stop the NDP from forming government. The NDP's chance of appealing to Green voters through policies they like is simply impossible if their leader is allowed to debate on television.  (rolls eyes) But that doesn't stop you from supporting the evil consortium's "rules" at the federal level.

Quote:
The criteria for being in the debate is supposed to be having representation in the House of Commons. Any Tom, Dick or Harry can put together some slapdash party and get 308 buffoons to agree to have their names on the ballot and then get 2% of the vote. We need debate between serious players - not having our time wasted with clutter like the so-called green party.

Supposed to be according to who? You and Harper tried making that case during the election and it went over like a lead balloon. Both the NDP and the Cons were forced to reverse their position in the middle of the campaign and give the Greens a big publicity win. Well played!

And funny enough you hear the same kind of arguments from Cons and Liberals for why there should be only two leaders in the debates since only they have a chance of becoming PM and everyone else is just a distraction and a minor player.

There are a lot of parallels between the sneering disdain you see for the NDP from Libs and Cons and the attitudes of some NDP hacks towards the Greens. I guess everyone likes to look down on someone from their perch, regardless of how low on the ladder it might be. There also seems to be a bit of a correlation between those who want to see smaller parties have less influence and those who oppose electoral reform. Oh I forgot, you support electoral reform, in theory, in the distant future....

 


Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in the upcoming referendum? By: Brian White (107 replies) January 29, 2009 - 11:20pm
  • Naci_Sey wrote:The NDP is By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 12:30am)
  • As far as I can gather from By: Wilf Day (Feb 8 2009 - 12:52am)
  • Naci_Sey wrote: Had MMP been By: Peter3 (Feb 5 2009 - 11:48pm)
  • Don't think that's clear at By: Naci_Sey (Feb 5 2009 - 11:20pm)
  • So Carole James is not By: NorthReport (Feb 5 2009 - 10:20pm)
  • A complete answer. Did you By: Naci_Sey (Feb 5 2009 - 10:00pm)
  • I'm curious what answer By: Fartful Codger (Feb 5 2009 - 9:51pm)
  • From a blog post I wrote By: Naci_Sey (Feb 5 2009 - 9:33pm)
  • It is kinda funny that By: Brian White (Feb 5 2009 - 9:07pm)
  • Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: V. Jara (Feb 3 2009 - 3:49am)
  • theleftyinvestor wrote: By: Wilf Day (Feb 3 2009 - 12:12am)
  • I think the trouble is that By: theleftyinvestor (Feb 1 2009 - 1:11pm)
  • Peter3 wrote:I'm curious By: Wilf Day (Jan 31 2009 - 11:13pm)
  • Peter3 wrote:It is not By: Naci_Sey (Jan 31 2009 - 9:44pm)
  • When Ontario had its By: Peter3 (Jan 31 2009 - 8:48pm)
  • Am a BC resident and have By: Naci_Sey (Jan 31 2009 - 8:12pm)
  • remind wrote:No, it is none By: scott (Jan 31 2009 - 7:33pm)
  • Which some people can't By: Coyote (Jan 31 2009 - 7:01pm)
  • No, it is none of the By: remind (Jan 31 2009 - 6:23pm)
  •  I think most of the By: Brian White (Jan 31 2009 - 5:52pm)
  • Wilf Day wrote:I don't know By: scott (Jan 31 2009 - 6:51pm)
  • I don't know whether Layton By: Wilf Day (Jan 31 2009 - 3:51pm)
  • Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: munroe (Jan 31 2009 - 3:45pm)
  • Brian White wrote:  Pro rep By: the grey (Jan 31 2009 - 1:52pm)
  • Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: Stockholm (Jan 31 2009 - 12:35pm)
  • Some people cite Tommy By: Ken Burch (Jan 31 2009 - 5:05am)
  • What is the NDP "in By: Coyote (Jan 30 2009 - 11:16pm)
  • Actually  Pro Rep is By: Brian White (Jan 30 2009 - 10:22pm)
  • V. Jara wrote:I think it By: Brian White (Jan 30 2009 - 10:17pm)
  • I think it would be an By: V. Jara (Jan 30 2009 - 4:23am)
  • The federal party is By: Coyote (Jan 30 2009 - 2:32am)
  •  So they are not allowed to By: Brian White (Jan 30 2009 - 1:55am)
  • Has anyone seen By: NorthReport (Jan 30 2009 - 1:16am)
  • The provincial sections are By: Coyote (Jan 30 2009 - 1:04am)
  • Brian White wrote:  That By: jasonJ2 (Jan 30 2009 - 12:35am)