Pay equity - Canada moves back, U.S. forward By: martin dufresne (15 replies) January 29, 2009 - 6:26pm
- Dr. Dawg provides some By: pogge (Mar 7 2009 - 7:41pm)
- Michelle wrote:Is there any By: Bärlüer (Mar 7 2009 - 6:32pm)
- Refuge wrote: I don't know By: Refuge (Mar 4 2009 - 9:27am)
- The fight to keep pay equity By: martin dufresne (Mar 3 2009 - 10:57am)
- The punitive measures By: radiorahim (Feb 26 2009 - 12:21am)
- Here it is from the By: Refuge (Feb 25 2009 - 8:32pm)
- Does anyone have the exact By: Unionist (Feb 25 2009 - 10:48am)
- Refuge wrote: yeah, IMO I By: It's Me D (Feb 25 2009 - 10:45am)
- yeah, IMO I think that is By: Refuge (Feb 25 2009 - 10:32am)
- Re: Pay equity - Canada moves back, U.S. forward By: Stargazer (Feb 25 2009 - 10:06am)
- Michelle wrote: Is there By: Refuge (Feb 25 2009 - 9:53am)
- Re: Pay equity - Canada moves back, U.S. forward By: Michelle (Feb 25 2009 - 8:37am)
- The way our system works is, By: Maysie (Feb 25 2009 - 7:20am)
- So this means that a human By: Pride for Red Dolores (Feb 25 2009 - 1:46am)
- The more I think about this By: Loretta (Feb 15 2009 - 8:44pm)
Upon reflection on this I really don't know how relevant it will be for non unionized workers. Even if they were allowed to use it after Unionized workers stopped using it without the teeth from Unions I wonder how quickly the governmnt would move to get rid of the panel for all workers.
It occurred to me when in another thread it was said that Unions have changed so much for people who are not even a part of the Union. This, I think, has the possibility of being a prime case.