There's still probably no God By: M. Spector (101 replies) January 29, 2009 - 8:31pmRe: There's still probably no God By: It's Me D (Feb 6 2009 - 1:50pm) Thanks for the By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 1:44pm) Not angry, just disappointed By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 1:41pm) Ah, invective and angry By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 1:32pm) Well I've read your notes to By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 1:35pm) Ah, ridicule and caricature, By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 12:47pm) GONG! None of the above for By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 11:01am) The desire for immortality. By: Caissa (Feb 6 2009 - 10:45am) I find people tend to By: wwSwimming (Feb 6 2009 - 10:32am) Re: There's still probably no God By: Unionist (Feb 6 2009 - 9:47am) Catchfire:"Terry Eagleton's By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 9:44am) Re: There's still probably no God By: Boom Boom (Feb 6 2009 - 9:08am) Terry Eagleton's criticism By: Catchfire (Feb 6 2009 - 5:56am) Where we are going is off By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 1:39am) Not sure where you're going By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 1:09am) Yes, and the Church did By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 1:09am) "Why? Because their power By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 12:38am) Peter3 wrote: The Bishops By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 12:21am) Fidel:The Church wasn't all By: Peter3 (Feb 5 2009 - 11:44pm) Michael Nenonen wrote:... I By: Refuge (Feb 5 2009 - 11:28pm) Peter3 wrote: I do believe By: Fidel (Feb 5 2009 - 10:57pm) Michael Nenonen wrote: The By: Peter3 (Feb 4 2009 - 4:25pm) Tommy_Paine wrote: "Do ants By: Fidel (Feb 4 2009 - 1:26pm) Michael Nenonen wrote:... I By: mersh (Feb 4 2009 - 11:59am) Didn't we have this sort of By: Unionist (Feb 4 2009 - 11:56am) Unionist wrote:Michael By: Fidel (Feb 4 2009 - 11:55am) Michael Nenonen wrote:Having By: Unionist (Feb 4 2009 - 11:45am) If people keep dragging up By: M. Spector (Feb 4 2009 - 11:43am) The ads seem to be founded By: Michael Nenonen (Feb 4 2009 - 11:00am) Quote:Halifax’s transit By: M. Spector (Feb 3 2009 - 11:16pm) The United Church joins the By: Doug (Feb 1 2009 - 9:39pm) "Do ants think we are gods? By: Tommy_Paine (Jan 30 2009 - 5:56pm) I have no problem with the By: oldgoat (Jan 30 2009 - 11:06am) Re: There's still probably no God By: Caissa (Jan 30 2009 - 11:04am) I have no problem with the By: Fidel (Jan 30 2009 - 10:52am)
- Let's continue here. By: Michelle (Mar 5 2009 - 3:42pm)
- unionist wrote: People get By: It's Me D (Mar 5 2009 - 3:24pm)
- Well yeah, I take people By: oldgoat (Mar 5 2009 - 3:10pm)
- Re: There's still probably no God By: Michelle (Mar 5 2009 - 3:04pm)
- oldgoat wrote:I can't help By: Unionist (Mar 5 2009 - 3:03pm)
- Unionist wrote:It's Me D By: Fidel (Mar 5 2009 - 2:57pm)
- Unionist, there's nothing By: oldgoat (Mar 5 2009 - 2:55pm)
- Unionist wrote:Before you By: RosaL (Mar 5 2009 - 2:54pm)
- It's Me D wrote:I know that By: Unionist (Mar 5 2009 - 2:46pm)
- Re: There's still probably no God By: oldgoat (Mar 5 2009 - 2:44pm)
- There's still probably no By: M. Spector (Mar 5 2009 - 2:40pm)
- Well there's this......son By: oldgoat (Mar 5 2009 - 2:35pm)
- Sven wrote:... when I heard By: Unionist (Mar 5 2009 - 2:30pm)
- What if God By: Doug (Mar 5 2009 - 2:26pm)
- Unionist wrote:Eagleton's By: Sven (Mar 4 2009 - 2:28pm)
- Pity about what happened By: It's Me D (Feb 9 2009 - 11:27am)
- Fidel wrote:I'm out'a this By: Sven (Feb 8 2009 - 1:11am)
- I'm out'a this thread until By: Fidel (Feb 8 2009 - 1:04am)
- Ah, Fidel, or Friedman, By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 8 2009 - 1:02am)
- Re: There's still probably no God By: oldgoat (Feb 8 2009 - 12:59am)
- NOW the "Frustration" By: Fidel (Feb 8 2009 - 12:57am)
- Fidel wrote:You're full of By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 8 2009 - 12:45am)
- GOD wrote:Don't make me come By: Sven (Feb 8 2009 - 12:32am)
- You're full of shit as usual By: Fidel (Feb 8 2009 - 12:31am)
- Re: There's still probably no God By: GOD (Feb 8 2009 - 12:25am)
- Fidel wrote:Frustrated Mess By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 8 2009 - 12:22am)
- Frustrated Mess wrote: After By: Fidel (Feb 8 2009 - 12:22am)
- After all this time you By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 7 2009 - 11:52pm)
- Wasnt it you or a generic By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 11:45pm)
- Re: There's still probably no God By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 7 2009 - 11:40pm)
- Frustrated Mess wrote:You By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 11:33pm)
- Re: There's still probably no God By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 7 2009 - 10:43pm)
- Frustrated Mess wrote: I By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 10:30pm)
- Re: There's still probably no God By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 10:06pm)
- I can't think on decaf. We By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 7 2009 - 9:55pm)
- Hey why dont you two get a By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 9:47pm)
- Frustrated Mess wrote:Now he By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 9:19pm)
- Re: There's still probably no God By: Frustrated Mess (Feb 7 2009 - 9:16pm)
- Fidel wrote:Okay, I get it By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 7:50pm)
- Or how about these.Seven By: NorthReport (Feb 7 2009 - 2:43pm)
- Don't give up, after all By: NorthReport (Feb 7 2009 - 2:38pm)
- Okay, I get it now. Link By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 2:35pm)
- Fidel wrote:I wouldnt mind By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 2:27pm)
- I wouldnt mind your gentle By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 2:25pm)
- Oh, sorry Fidel, you wanted By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 3:37pm)
- Fidel, you shouldn't worry By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 2:15pm)
- Meanwhile, back at the ranch By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 2:34pm)
- Unionist wrote: the By: Slumberjack (Feb 7 2009 - 2:05pm)
- Perhaps unionist could post By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 2:10pm)
- The word "probably" in the By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 1:55pm)
- Can we have a By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 1:55pm)
- Fidel wrote:And Thanks, By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 1:44pm)
- And Thanks, unionist. It By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 2:07pm)
- Fidel wrote: their local By: triciamarie (Feb 7 2009 - 12:43pm)
- I lift up my eyes to the By: Unionist (Feb 7 2009 - 12:04pm)
- due to a burst of light from By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 12:37pm)
- Peter3 wrote: The By: Fidel (Feb 7 2009 - 12:48pm)
- Unionist wrote: I think By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 5:13pm)
- duplicate post created by By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 5:02pm)
- Fidel: Jesus wept (a By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 5:04pm)
- It's Me D wrote:Fidel thanks By: Unionist (Feb 6 2009 - 4:47pm)
- So what you're saying is, By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 3:50pm)
- Fidel wrote:Well now you're By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 3:02pm)
- Peter3 wrote:Fidel wrote: By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 2:32pm)
- Fidel wrote: That By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 2:16pm)
- Well here is another claim By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 2:18pm)
Unionist, there's nothing you say I disagree with. Pretty much reflects my own feelings. I can't help but wondering though, about that psychological hole that seems to exisit in some and not others, but appears irrespective of intelligence, and is filled by some sort of religion.
I guess I see it as a sociological curiosity, but in my work I do have to muck about somewhat inside peoples heads, and my clients end up talking about that stuff. I don't bring it up, but of course I'm respectful, and will try to work with everyone within the context of their own beliefs.