Unionist
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 12323
Joined: Dec 11 2005

oldgoat wrote:

I can't help but wondering though, about that psychological hole that seems to exisit in some and not others, but appears irrespective of intelligence, and is filled by some sort of religion.

Sure, and sometimes it's filled with rage or nationalism or chauvinism or go-get-a-weapon-and-murder-all-your-neighbours or golf or whatever.

Sorry, oldgoat, I'm not buying that. People get religion from their parents, with statistically insignificant exceptions. And so, the merry-go-round of xenophobia and futile faith goes on.

That doesn't mean you have to talk people out of their faith. Not at all. But make sure you respect the people - not their asinine ideas. People deserve respect. Bullshit does not.

Chavez is brilliant. Whether he believes in that Christ crap or not, he has an aim - to mobilize the people for good. He attempts to use their faith toward a good end. If he can do so, I applaud him. Until then, I will remain skeptical, because of the horrors that history has demonstrated.

 


There's still probably no God By: M. Spector (101 replies) January 29, 2009 - 7:31pm
  • Re: There's still probably no God By: It's Me D (Feb 6 2009 - 12:50pm)
  • Thanks for the By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 12:44pm)
  • Not angry, just disappointed By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 12:41pm)
  • Ah, invective and angry By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 12:32pm)
  • Well I've read your notes to By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 12:35pm)
  • Ah, ridicule and caricature, By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 11:47am)
  • GONG! None of the above for By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 10:01am)
  • The desire for immortality. By: Caissa (Feb 6 2009 - 9:45am)
  • I find people tend to By: wwSwimming (Feb 6 2009 - 9:32am)
  • Re: There's still probably no God By: Unionist (Feb 6 2009 - 8:47am)
  • Catchfire:"Terry Eagleton's By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 8:44am)
  • Re: There's still probably no God By: Boom Boom (Feb 6 2009 - 8:08am)
  • Terry Eagleton's criticism By: Catchfire (Feb 6 2009 - 4:56am)
  • Where we are going is off By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 12:39am)
  • Not sure where you're going By: Peter3 (Feb 6 2009 - 12:09am)
  • Yes, and the Church did By: Fidel (Feb 6 2009 - 12:09am)
  • "Why? Because their power By: Peter3 (Feb 5 2009 - 11:38pm)
  • Peter3 wrote:  The Bishops By: Fidel (Feb 5 2009 - 11:21pm)
  • Fidel:The Church wasn't all By: Peter3 (Feb 5 2009 - 10:44pm)
  • Michael Nenonen wrote:... I By: Refuge (Feb 5 2009 - 10:28pm)
  • Peter3 wrote: I do believe By: Fidel (Feb 5 2009 - 9:57pm)
  • Michael Nenonen wrote: The By: Peter3 (Feb 4 2009 - 3:25pm)
  • Tommy_Paine wrote: "Do ants By: Fidel (Feb 4 2009 - 12:26pm)
  • Michael Nenonen wrote:... I By: mersh (Feb 4 2009 - 10:59am)
  • Didn't we have this sort of By: Unionist (Feb 4 2009 - 10:56am)
  • Unionist wrote:Michael By: Fidel (Feb 4 2009 - 10:55am)
  • Michael Nenonen wrote:Having By: Unionist (Feb 4 2009 - 10:45am)
  • If people keep dragging up By: M. Spector (Feb 4 2009 - 10:43am)
  • The ads seem to be founded By: Michael Nenonen (Feb 4 2009 - 10:00am)
  • Quote:Halifax’s transit By: M. Spector (Feb 3 2009 - 10:16pm)
  • The United Church joins the By: Doug (Feb 1 2009 - 8:39pm)
  • "Do ants think we are gods? By: Tommy_Paine (Jan 30 2009 - 4:56pm)
  • I have no problem with the By: oldgoat (Jan 30 2009 - 10:06am)
  • Re: There's still probably no God By: Caissa (Jan 30 2009 - 10:04am)
  • I have no problem with the By: Fidel (Jan 30 2009 - 9:52am)