Harper acknowledges Afghan defeat By: Frustrated Mess (51 replies) March 5, 2009 - 11:31amM. Spector wrote:I thought By: Frmrsldr (Mar 7 2009 - 1:15am) Frmrsldr wrote: By: Fidel (Mar 7 2009 - 1:14am) Actually, I don't believe By: M. Spector (Mar 7 2009 - 1:12am) M. Spector wrote:I thought By: Frmrsldr (Mar 7 2009 - 1:11am) Thank you for the link M. By: Frmrsldr (Mar 7 2009 - 12:59am) I thought "our" troops were By: M. Spector (Mar 7 2009 - 12:30am) Actually, the points I By: Frmrsldr (Mar 7 2009 - 12:25am) Is "special envoy" code for By: Cueball (Mar 6 2009 - 3:21pm) Harper recommends the By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 6 2009 - 3:10pm) Frmrsldr wrote: Harper a By: Fidel (Mar 6 2009 - 1:45pm) ... yet. By: Unionist (Mar 6 2009 - 11:37am) It might just be business as By: M. Spector (Mar 6 2009 - 11:35am) M. Spector wrote:Since when By: Unionist (Mar 6 2009 - 11:27am) Since when does inciting By: M. Spector (Mar 6 2009 - 11:14am) Harper a By: Frmrsldr (Mar 6 2009 - 10:54am) Frmrsldr wrote:2005 to 2007 By: Lard Tunderin Jeezus (Mar 6 2009 - 1:38am) Frmrsldr wrote: When the By: M. Spector (Mar 6 2009 - 1:23am) Hey people,What's also By: Frmrsldr (Mar 6 2009 - 1:10am) M. Spector wrote:remind By: Fidel (Mar 5 2009 - 7:39pm) I think Rikardo was By: Jingles (Mar 5 2009 - 6:26pm) remind wrote: Rikardo By: M. Spector (Mar 5 2009 - 6:05pm) I think there were By: Cueball (Mar 5 2009 - 6:02pm) Rikardo wrote:Afghanistan is By: remind (Mar 5 2009 - 5:28pm) Re: Harper acknowledges Afghan defeat By: Rikardo (Mar 5 2009 - 5:10pm) Frmrsldr wrote:What Harper By: contrarianna (Mar 5 2009 - 4:53pm) You forget By: Frmrsldr (Mar 5 2009 - 11:24am) Rikardo,What Harper said By: Frmrsldr (Mar 5 2009 - 11:05am) Re: Harper acknowledges Aghan defeat By: Rikardo (Mar 4 2009 - 8:21pm) actually FM Afghanistan is a By: johnpauljones (Mar 2 2009 - 4:57pm) Re: Harper acknowledges Aghan defeat By: Frustrated Mess (Mar 2 2009 - 4:54pm) Re: Harper acknowledges Aghan defeat By: Rikardo (Mar 2 2009 - 4:46pm) So we're only down by a By: Fidel (Mar 2 2009 - 3:34pm) Frustrated Mess wrote:Quote: By: HUAC (Mar 2 2009 - 2:08pm) Multi-billion Dollar Mining By: Fidel (Mar 1 2009 - 10:00pm) I don't think right-wing By: Maysie (Mar 1 2009 - 5:59pm)
- Re: Harper acknowledges Afghan defeat By: Boom Boom (Mar 20 2009 - 4:00pm)
- Time to quit By: NorthReport (Mar 15 2009 - 10:37am)
- Re: Harper acknowledges Afghan defeat By: Sarann (Mar 10 2009 - 11:57am)
- Obama: US should reach out By: Fidel (Mar 7 2009 - 11:27pm)
- justjazz,the link that M. By: Frmrsldr (Mar 7 2009 - 10:51pm)
- Frmrsldr wrote:When the By: justjazz (Mar 7 2009 - 10:58am)
- I get the feeling Harper has By: Fidel (Mar 7 2009 - 3:27am)
- Just had a thought. This is By: Frmrsldr (Mar 7 2009 - 3:00am)
- The role of our troops has By: Frmrsldr (Mar 7 2009 - 2:37am)
- On TV and live around the By: Fidel (Mar 7 2009 - 2:14am)
- Fidel,The next paranoia the By: Frmrsldr (Mar 7 2009 - 1:56am)
- You can say that again. By: Fidel (Mar 7 2009 - 1:52am)
- Fidel,In Italy during the By: Frmrsldr (Mar 7 2009 - 1:48am)
- Fidel,In Italy during the By: Frmrsldr (Mar 7 2009 - 1:39am)
- What if there's another By: Fidel (Mar 7 2009 - 1:39am)
- Re: Harper acknowledges Afghan defeat By: Frmrsldr (Mar 7 2009 - 1:25am)
What Harper said isn't anything new.
Our Bush clone sock puppet Prime Minister merely parroted what General David McKiernan (Commander of NATO and Coalition forces in Afghanistan), General David Petraeus (CENTCOM Commander, responsible for the Iraq and Afghan theaters of war), General Robert Gates (U.S. Defense Secretary), Admiral Michael Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Brig. Gen. Mark Carlton Smith (former Commander of British troops in Afghanistan) have already said.
What these gentlemen have done is reluctantly admitted to the inescapable and demonstrable truth about what is going on in Afghanistan....
The stalling tactic is that of the "Vietnamization" of Afghanistan. That is, they shift the "responsibility' for fighting the insurgency to the fantasy of a viable US-acceptable government. This stalling tactic is just as absurdly unobtainable as a Western victory itself.
However, the optics for our quisling Government are much improved for re-framing defeat: "Heck, we have tried everything to help these people but if the Afghanis themselves can't, or won't, come together in this noble cause, we can't do it for them"
It sounds much better than:
"We have lied and squandered the lives and treasure of Canada for an obscure and unobtainable victory. However, since our US masters have requested us as cannon fodder, we'll keep doing it at least until 2012. Vote for us anyway."