Brian White
rabble-rouser-machine
Member: 9013
Joined: Jan 26 2005

O Crap.  The e may ding dongs have taken over.

Anyway,    2 ndp MP's from van island have come out in support of a yes in the referendum.  BUT for the BC Libs and the provincial NDP it is all quiet on the western front.

It is pretty clear that Campbell and James have done a private gag order on their MLA's.

I know some bc libs and some NDP candidates supported it last time.  Where are they now?  I said in another forum that the NDP could still make a lot of political hay if they attacked the 2 beating 3 concept that comes from the threshold.  Would you see it as a fair fight if a boxer had one hand tied behind his back? Or a sprinter with ankle bracelets racing against someone who has a 50 meter head start?  

I think someone should do THAT video. What the 60% threshold really means, 


Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in the upcoming referendum? By: Brian White (107 replies) January 29, 2009 - 10:20pm
  • Naci_Sey wrote:The NDP is By: Fidel (Feb 5 2009 - 11:30pm)
  • As far as I can gather from By: Wilf Day (Feb 7 2009 - 11:52pm)
  • Naci_Sey wrote: Had MMP been By: Peter3 (Feb 5 2009 - 10:48pm)
  • Don't think that's clear at By: Naci_Sey (Feb 5 2009 - 10:20pm)
  • So Carole James is not By: NorthReport (Feb 5 2009 - 9:20pm)
  • A complete answer. Did you By: Naci_Sey (Feb 5 2009 - 9:00pm)
  • I'm curious what answer By: Fartful Codger (Feb 5 2009 - 8:51pm)
  • From a blog post I wrote By: Naci_Sey (Feb 5 2009 - 8:33pm)
  • It is kinda funny that By: Brian White (Feb 5 2009 - 8:07pm)
  • Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: V. Jara (Feb 3 2009 - 2:49am)
  • theleftyinvestor wrote: By: Wilf Day (Feb 2 2009 - 11:12pm)
  • I think the trouble is that By: theleftyinvestor (Feb 1 2009 - 12:11pm)
  • Peter3 wrote:I'm curious By: Wilf Day (Jan 31 2009 - 10:13pm)
  • Peter3 wrote:It is not By: Naci_Sey (Jan 31 2009 - 8:44pm)
  • When Ontario had its By: Peter3 (Jan 31 2009 - 7:48pm)
  • Am a BC resident and have By: Naci_Sey (Jan 31 2009 - 7:12pm)
  • remind wrote:No, it is none By: scott (Jan 31 2009 - 6:33pm)
  • Which some people can't By: Coyote (Jan 31 2009 - 6:01pm)
  • No, it is none of the By: remind (Jan 31 2009 - 5:23pm)
  •  I think most of the By: Brian White (Jan 31 2009 - 4:52pm)
  • Wilf Day wrote:I don't know By: scott (Jan 31 2009 - 5:51pm)
  • I don't know whether Layton By: Wilf Day (Jan 31 2009 - 2:51pm)
  • Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: munroe (Jan 31 2009 - 2:45pm)
  • Brian White wrote:  Pro rep By: the grey (Jan 31 2009 - 12:52pm)
  • Re: Should Layton call on BC NDP voters to support Pro Rep in th By: Stockholm (Jan 31 2009 - 11:35am)
  • Some people cite Tommy By: Ken Burch (Jan 31 2009 - 4:05am)
  • What is the NDP "in By: Coyote (Jan 30 2009 - 10:16pm)
  • Actually  Pro Rep is By: Brian White (Jan 30 2009 - 9:22pm)
  • V. Jara wrote:I think it By: Brian White (Jan 30 2009 - 9:17pm)
  • I think it would be an By: V. Jara (Jan 30 2009 - 3:23am)
  • The federal party is By: Coyote (Jan 30 2009 - 1:32am)
  •  So they are not allowed to By: Brian White (Jan 30 2009 - 12:55am)
  • Has anyone seen By: NorthReport (Jan 30 2009 - 12:16am)
  • The provincial sections are By: Coyote (Jan 30 2009 - 12:04am)
  • Brian White wrote:  That By: jasonJ2 (Jan 29 2009 - 11:35pm)