Unionist
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 12323
Joined: Dec 11 2005

Lord Palmerston wrote:

Unionist wrote:
We can improve the quality of education as well as eliminate segregation, discrimination, and funding of religious indoctrination, all at the same time. We're all grown up now.

Sorry, we can't do both. 

That's what is gradually dawning on me.

On the one occasion when the ONDP was accidentally in power, it had priorities too, just like Bookish Agrarian does.

Its priorities did not include keeping promises (public auto insurance), respecting workers and their freedoms, or respecting the equality of  the LGBT community. It would no doubt have been political suicide for the NDP to nationalize auto insurance (even though it came to power on that lying promise); to respect public sector collective agreements; and to ask its own caucus to not be homophobic. Never mind taking some dramatic, bold, socialist action in the face of the economic crisis.

So, the ONDP played it safe and did none of those things. And it did not commit suicide.

It was murdered.

For almost a generation now.

Because it clearly told the people of Ontario that there was no daylight between an NDP government and the ones that had come before - so why bother? And they still haven't risen from the dead.

 


If the Liberals ended funding for Catholic schools, would the ONDP object? By: Lord Palmerston (110 replies) March 8, 2009 - 10:01pm
  • M. Spector wrote:Even if By: wage zombie (Mar 9 2009 - 6:15pm)
  • If you're saying the ONDP By: Lord Palmerston (Mar 9 2009 - 5:55pm)
  • Liberal Democrats 62 By: madmax (Mar 9 2009 - 5:45pm)
  • Re: If the Liberals ended funding for Catholic schools, would th By: G. Babbitt (Mar 9 2009 - 5:28pm)
  • dippergal By: Lord Palmerston (Mar 9 2009 - 5:08pm)
  • And the reason Liberal By: Fidel (Mar 9 2009 - 5:02pm)
  • Something to By: riffraffrenegade (Mar 9 2009 - 4:53pm)
  • It was a failure of our news By: Fidel (Mar 9 2009 - 4:49pm)
  • Unionist wrote:Bookish By: Bookish Agrarian (Mar 9 2009 - 4:43pm)
  • It's a pretty tenuous, if By: M. Spector (Mar 9 2009 - 4:25pm)
  • And just as a By: Fidel (Mar 9 2009 - 4:03pm)
  • Stockholm wrote:FYI: Bill By: M. Spector (Mar 9 2009 - 3:19pm)
  • madmax wrote: I heard that By: Fidel (Mar 9 2009 - 2:41pm)
  • Even if that is true (and By: M. Spector (Mar 9 2009 - 2:26pm)
  • I heard that Mr. Prue was By: madmax (Mar 9 2009 - 2:15pm)
  • Bookish Agrarian wrote:My By: Unionist (Mar 9 2009 - 12:55pm)
  • BA:"No to beating a dead By: George Victor (Mar 9 2009 - 12:11pm)
  • Our party .the ONDP, had the By: peterjcassidy (Mar 9 2009 - 11:40am)
  • Re: If the Liberals ended funding for Catholic schools, would th By: Stockholm (Mar 9 2009 - 10:35am)
  • By the way, if John Tory had By: M. Spector (Mar 9 2009 - 10:19am)
  • dippergal wrote: I just have By: M. Spector (Mar 9 2009 - 10:13am)
  • The fact that Prue got a By: Stockholm (Mar 9 2009 - 10:10am)
  • Bookish Agrarian wrote: No By: M. Spector (Mar 9 2009 - 10:02am)
  • Although some of my dipper By: dippergal (Mar 9 2009 - 8:44am)
  • Lord Palmerston wrote: By: Fidel (Mar 9 2009 - 12:47am)
  • Unionist wrote: prosperity By: Lord Palmerston (Mar 9 2009 - 12:31am)
  • Unionist wrote: I guess I By: Fidel (Mar 9 2009 - 12:10am)
  • My yawns are actually a By: Bookish Agrarian (Mar 8 2009 - 11:51pm)
  • I guess I missed your By: Unionist (Mar 8 2009 - 11:42pm)
  • Re: If the Liberals ended funding for Catholic schools, would th By: Bookish Agrarian (Mar 8 2009 - 11:32pm)
  • Bookish Agrarian wrote:... By: Unionist (Mar 8 2009 - 11:26pm)
  • Quote:If the Liberals ended By: Fidel (Mar 8 2009 - 11:21pm)
  • No to beating a dead horse By: Bookish Agrarian (Mar 8 2009 - 11:11pm)
  • Re: If the Liberals ended funding for Catholic schools, would th By: Lord Palmerston (Mar 8 2009 - 10:58pm)
  • Re: If the Liberals ended funding for Catholic schools, would th By: Bookish Agrarian (Mar 8 2009 - 10:48pm)