Climate crime and duplicity

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support today for as little as $1 per month!

For the Harper government global warming is a business opportunity not an urgent issue of mutual survival.

Canada has adopted a Junior Chamber of Commerce approach to the UN environmental talks on climate change in Bali. In separate acceptance speeches on Monday in Oslo, Noble Peace Prizes recipients Al Gore, and R. K. Pachauri, Chairman, of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change referred to climate change as a global emergency. In Bali, the Canadian delegation includes representatives of two companies from Minister of Environment Baird's riding, along to peddle environmental products at a Canadian sponsored trade show, while opposition parties, provincial governments, and NGO environmentalists were left off the delegation.

For the Harper government, global warming is a business opportunity, not an urgent issue of mutual survival to be addressed on behalf of all Canadians in front of the world community.The UN Bali meetings were convened to set out the next steps in reducing green house gas emissions. Governments are addressing important questions: what is the agenda following on from the Kyoto accord, how can progress be sped up, and what agreements are needed from states to meet targets for climate change reduction?

The Canadian government has distinguished itself by its duplicity. UN agreements have specified reductions from the 1990 levels of emissions. Canada is proposing to reduce emissions from the 2006 levels, ignoring commitments made, but not met, by the previous government. No international treaty process can function if every time a change of government occurs, the new ministers get to rewrite their treaty commitments. But Canada, a founding member of the UN, has now adopted this position. Under international law this makes our country an international climate change criminal.

Monday, Minister Baird announced $86 million in funds to aid Canadian communities affected by global warming, and pretended this was a part of Canadaâe(TM)s commitment to do something about climate change. In fact the Conservative minister announced a program, which had previously been canceled by the Harper government (when Baird was Treasury Board Minister, so he slashed it himself), and that had nothing to do with reducing or eliminating green house gas emissions, which is what the conference is about.

Canadian duplicity was even singled out by Yvo de Boer, the Head of the UN Environment Programme, who said that Canada has announced it has no intention of meeting its Kyoto commitments, but has also laid out that it expects developing countries to make binding commitments to meet new targets.

The low point was when the Conservatives wrapped themselves in the Canadian flag in order to back off on making commitments to reduce major emissions in Canada. Upon arrival in Bali, where it is accompanied by energy giant Encana, Minister Baird proclaimed that, for Canada, undertaking commitments on reduction of industrial emissions without getting similar commitments from the U.S., would be the equivalent of adopting a policy of unilateral disarmament, given that the U.S. is Canada's most important competitor on world markets.

In fact, it is the Canadian government that refuses to arm itself to deal with global warming. Getting hard caps on major emitters is what stopping global warming is all about. An international agreement to do just that will increase the sovereignty of its signators, putting pressure on companies worldwide, irrespective of nationality, as well as laggard governments.

Blaming the U.S. and China, for their own inaction, all the Harper government has done is to ignore the potential leverage over world public opinion a successful UN climate change conference will have.World public opinion is the important superpower on the issue of climate change. If Canada wants the U.S. and others to agree to meet emission reduction targets, it must first accept its own international commitments.

Further Reading

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.