Refugee rights experts say anti-terrorism legislation violates human rights.
Immigration experts say that both Bill C-36 and Bill C-11 violate the Universal Declaration of Human Rights for refugees. Bill C-36 allows for imprisonment without trial, electronic surveillance and secret trials. Bill C-11 is the soon-to-be-passed legislation regarding immigration policy.
Canada accepts between 20,000 to 30,000 refugees a year. In 1998, 22,644 refugees became permanent residents. In 20002001, Canada detained 8,790 people for an average of sixteen days. While the new laws are intended to speed up the application process, they are also expected to detain refugees for longer periods of time, and deport them in greater frequency.
Currently, refugees coming from countries with severe rights abuses are protected from deportation. Catherine Balfour of Amnesty International Toronto is concerned Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) will be allowed to deport anybody to anything, since the new law allows deportations, even if that means sending refugees back to torture.
Under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the right of a person to not be subject to torture is unassailable. So Canadas breaking international law, says Balfour. And while they are in Canada, refugees often exist in legal limbo for years, open to deportation for minor infractions, often unable to work or go to school.
Refugee lawyers complain the new bill makes it impossible to fight deportations on equal footing with the CIC. There is a significant increase in the power of immigration officers to exclude refugees on security grounds on the basis of information we cant get access to, says Anthony Norfolk, an immigration and refugee lawyer in Vancouver.
Officials will be able to block refugees from risk assessment in an arbitrary way that we will not be allowed to see, Norfolk says. Its quite frightening. Obviously its going to be challenged under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Its just not consistent with Canadian tradition.
Norfolk suspects ulterior motives. I always say follow the money. Security is going to be a bigger business now because of fears that are entirely understandable. But the checks and balances are not going into the system at the same time.
Montreal-based refugee lawyer Bill Sloan says the legislation propagates the view that there are good refugees and bad refugees. If you want to deny someone their rights, first youve got to demonize them. You do this by making a distinction between legal versus illegal refugees. Thats bullshit.
Sloan says refugees often have to escape their countries immediately, often by illegal means. The documents you use to travel should not be what decide if youre a legal or illegal refugee. Just getting here is so hard already. Sloan also criticizes the selection process for immigration and refugee board members, and how immigration officers are appointed arbitrarily. Its a joke. Norfolk agrees. Qualifications are wide open, he says. The problem is, there doesnt seem to be any proper evaluation process for those that are not good.
Norfolk says applying for refugee status from outside Canada pits refugees against immigration applicants. They look at somebody and say, How would this person do as an independent migrant? The basic ideal is an Anglo- or Francophone university-educated breeding pair. It means everybody is fighting over the same demographic.
As much as critics have to say about how the bill looks on paper, they are also worried about what they cant see. Most of the real impacts of the bills are going to be seen in the regulations, which are just decided internally, says Gitanjali Lena of the Canadian Council for Refugees. That s where the real meat of it will be.
Immigration Minister Elinor Caplan has said most of the nineteen men who hijacked the September 11 planes entered the United States legally; she said intelligence gathering, and not stricter immigration or refugee policy, will stop terrorism.
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.