While the debates around prostitution and sex work have been dividing the feminist community for years, conversations recently became heated after the Women's Worlds 2011 conference, which took place in Ottawa from July 3-7. While many abolitionists felt both relieved and inspired at the camaraderie and unified atmosphere among feminists at the conference and at the visible existence of an allied feminist movement to end prostitution, some decriminalization and sex worker advocates felt differently. In an article published by Xtra West, entitled: "Hostile clashes dominate women's conference," a few attendees were said to have been "beaten down" and "silenced." While the media has a strong hand in misrepresenting feminist arguments around prostitution, particularly the abolitionist view, could it also be that feminists are simply not listening to one another? Your hosts, Nicole Deagan and Meghan Murphy explore both ends of the debates.
The first half of the show features an interview with Women's Worlds attendee, Chris Bruckert, an associate professor of criminology at the University of Ottawa who has done extensive research in the area of sex work. This interview is followed by a round table discussion between Lee Lakeman, a pioneer of women's anti-violence services in Canada who has been a part of the collective at Vancouver Rape Relief and Women's Shelter since 1978, Erin Graham, a PhD candidate in the department of Educational Studies at UBC whose work interrogates and critiques the emergence of the concept and practices of "harm reduction" as social services approaches to women in prostitution, and Cherry Smiley, who works at a rape crisis centre and transition house, and is a former member of the Aboriginal Women's Action Network and is a radical feminist and prostitution abolitionist.
For more information about The F Word, please visit: www.feminisms.org
Thank you for reading this story...
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.
If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.
We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing.