The F Word

The invisible man: Reflections on the Bedford case

| April 10, 2012


Artist: The F Word
Title: The F Word - The Invisible Man: Reflections on the Bedford case - A talk by Janine Benedet
Year: 2012
Length: 0:50:02
Format: 44.1kHz, 128Kbps

Show Notes:

The invisible man: Reflections on the Bedford case

The Ontario Court of Appeal recently released its judgment in Bedford v. Canada, a case which challenged Canada’s prostitution laws as unconstitutional. The court struck down the law criminalizing brothels but upheld the communication provision, that is the law that criminalizes street prostitution. While some hail this decision as a victory, many believe the decision and the purpose of the case has been misunderstood and misrepresented.

On April 3, 2012 Janine Benedet presented a talk at the University of British Columbia law school, called: "The Invisible Man: Reflections on the Bedford case”. She looks at discourse surrounding the case, representations of the issues, potential implications of the decision, as well as what has been left out of the discussion surrounding prostitution in Canada and in the Bedford case.

Professor Benedet teaches in the fields of criminal law, labour law and sexual assault law. Her main areas of research interests include pornography, labour employment law, and prostitution. She was co-counsel for the intervenor – the Women’s Coalition for the Abolition of Prostitution in the Bedford case.

For more information about The F Word, or to check out our blog, please visit:


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.