At a rally Wednesday, organizations from Canada, El Salvador and around the world confronted Canadian-Australian mining company Oceana Gold, whose subsidiary is suing El Salvador for $301 million (USD).
Listen to speeches from the rally. Speakers included Maude Barlow - Council of Canadians, Raul Burbano - Fommon Frontiers, Monica Gutiérrez and Rachel Small - Mining Injustice Solidarity Network (MISN), Ivan - Latin American and Caribbean solidarity network (LACSN, Xenia Marroquin - Foro del Agua a ASPRODE, El Salvador and Mary Ann Manahan - Focus on the Global South, Philippines.
From the press release:
Toronto - Today, dozens of organizations from Canada, El Salvador and around the world will confront Canadian-Australian mining company Oceana Gold, whose subsidiary is suing El Salvador for $301 million (USD). El Salvador's offence: refusing to a grant a permit to a gold mine that would contaminate 60 per cent of the population's drinking water. In October 2013, Oceana Gold acquired Canadian-based Pacific Rim Mining, which was in the midst of a lawsuit. After acquiring the company, Oceana Gold upped its lawsuit from $70 million to $301 million (USD).
In anticipation of next week's court case -- to be heard on Monday, September 15 at the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes in Washington, D.C. -- the Council of Canadians, the Latin American Solidarity Network, the Mining Injustice Solidarity Network and others will descend on the company's Toronto headquarters to present a letter from people affected by the decision. The letter demands that the company withdraw the lawsuit.The date of the court case, September 15, coincides with El Salvador's Independence Day, an irony that was not lost on the groups protesting.
"We are asking the company, particularly on the eve of the country's independence day, to give the Salvadoran people their rightful control over their own environment and resources," says Maude Barlow, national chairperson of the Council of Canadians. "We have to hold our fellow Canadians accountable for jeopardizing El Salvador's democracy and its environment. The source of life, water is non-negotiable. El Salvador is just doing what any responsible country would do."
In El Salvador, people have died or lost their drinking water sources because of gold mining, contributing to a rising tide against mining. In 2008, the El Salvador government introduced a de facto moratorium on large-scale mining maintained by President Salvador Sánchez Cerén. Public opinion has categorically opposed industrial mining in El Salvador given the negative impacts of proposed projects on an environmentally stressed country largely dependent on a single watershed.
"It is a rare instance of a national, non-partisan, widely held consensus," says Xenia Marroquin, from El Salvador's Foro del Agua. "The stakes are high for the people of El Salvador. Beyond the financial costs, the ruling will determine whether a foreign tribunal can overrule a democratically elected government and its policies that protect the public interest and the environment.""Oceana Gold is suing for the right to poison the water in a situation where 90 per cent of the water is already contaminated," added Raul Burbano, Program Director at Common Frontiers.
Background: from greenleft weekly
Australian company sues El Salvador for right to mine
Saturday, September 6, 2014 By Neville Spencer
People gathered outside the World Bank office in Sydney on September 5 to protest the bank’s involvement in an Australian mining company’s attempt to sue the government of El Salvador for US$301 million.
Pacific Rim, a Canadian company that was bought by Australian OceanaGold last year, applied to mine gold in northern El Salvador in 2004. The Salvadoran government refused it permission, arguing the company did not own or have rights to the land it proposed to mine, it did not have environmental permissions and it did not submit a final feasibility study for the project.
Thank you for reading this story...
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.
If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.
We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing in 2017.