The Toronto municipal election is many months away, but so far the mayoral front-runners have offered nothing inspirational.
George Smitherman and Rocco Rossi, both Liberal in name only (LINOs?), are in a heated race to the bottom over who can say "privatize" the most, who can more adeptly lambaste unions, who can continue to repeat that insidious fabrication that government shouldn't be in the business of being in business.
Rossi, while the rest of the western world eyes enhanced public transit and more (and safer) bike lanes, wants to dismantle the former and relegate the latter to winding bucolic backstreets, where one's trip from say Danforth and Broadview to Yonge and Bloor becomes nearly impossible or at least hellishly long if arterial roads are verboten (maybe Rossi plans a bike barge crossing the lazy Don River...)
The ever-peevish, thin-skinned Smitherman hears Rossi's promises to privatize public assets and interests, a policy plank that gets the right-wing suburbanites giddy (either because they dream of profiting from sold off public assets or because they collectively wet their pants anytime unions and municipal employees are bashed), and Smitherman, neo-liberal metamorphosis complete (which I suppose makes him an actual neo liberal), bellows louder that no, he likes privatizing stuff more!
Joe Pantalone stands as the lone progressive candidate for mayor after the gentle giant Adam Giambrone was sunk by the hectoring, righteous voices of the city's puritans.
However, Pantalone hasn't ignited the passions of progressives. We are still casting about, hoping that someone with a vision, ideas to make this city great, and not just a dour minder of money, obsessed with administrivia, will come forward. Or, since the election is some months off, Joe Pantalone will suddenly inspire.
This morning we were teased by an announcement that Mayor David Miller would be holding a news conference, the details of which were scant.
The absence of details, because nature abhors a vacuum, caused some to speculate that Miller would reverse his decision to run again.
Just a few months ago, Miller, shedding tears, said that his career in municipal politics would be over come next election and that his family is his priority. Although I was saddened to see him go, I couldn't have agreed with him more - his reasons were sound.
As we approach the Ides of March, this announcement, had it been about Miller's decision to run again for mayor, would have had Pantalone asking "et tu, Brute?"
But it was not to be. Miller announced a budget surplus of $100 million. Good news, but not the news many were expecting (Councillor Rob Ford could barely contain his glee when he thought the press conference was to announce Miller's intention to leave post-haste because Miller had found a new job).
We have until October 24 to push our candidates for mayor to make this race about ideas and the vision thing and not merely a cynical ploy to pit suburban against urban, cyclists and transit users against motorists.
We must demand to hear positions on social justice and the rights and participation of citizens rather than the corporatization of government and the granting of democratic power to unelected businesses.
The Toronto Star has launched "YourCityMyCity [2]" where bloggers and columnists aim to "ignite a debate about how to make the city great".
This is a welcome initiative. But it won't mean anything unless citizens become engaged. We must push all municipal candidates to unveil interesting and perhaps unconventional ideas rather than offer the monochromatic vision of privatizing stuff.
We have to make sure this election is one about the people of Toronto.
Links:
[1] http://rabble.ca/taxonomy/term/7763
[2] http://www.thestar.com/YourCityMyCity
[3] http://rabble.ca/print/blogs/bloggers/ericmang/2010/03/candidates-mayor-toronto-must-offer-vision-citizens#comment-1121998
[4] http://rabble.ca/print/blogs/bloggers/ericmang/2010/03/candidates-mayor-toronto-must-offer-vision-citizens#comment-1125361
[5] http://rabble.ca/user
[6] http://rabble.ca/user/register
"Pushing" the candidates for mayor to make the race "about ideas and the vision thing" is no strategy at all. There is no evidence that candidates' minds can be changed by the voters, and plenty of evidence that the mind-changing process works the other way around.
If the voters want a mayor who is going to be responsive to their needs rather than the needs of corporate plutocrats then they are going to have to nominate and vote for someone. None of the current declared candidates will ever meet those criteria, no matter how much "pushing" the electorate does.
Toronto is going to be a very different city in three years' time, and you're not going to like it.
Readers of your blog, Eric, should be reminded that when you limit your vision to a small area of examination, you will find equally limited results. It's kind of a Visual version of "you get what you pay for".
This applies to a search for quality mayoral candidates that chooses only from among those who the media have suggested ought to be popular and worthy of your notice because their pronouncements, while not exactly showing the leadership that the city desperately requires in its next Mayor, are entertaining and sell papers.
Given the slate to whom those criteria apply and that your search has been limited by its narrow information frame, is it any wonder that you can't come up with a "winner"?
Mark State
"off the radar" Mayoralty Candidate