As we enter the final stretch of the Toronto municipal election, two things have become abundantly clear.
First, we need a new and better way of electing our mayor and city councillors. A voting system that forces many people to vote strategically rather than sincerely, and that creates a council not reflecting our city's diversity, has no place in a 21st-century democracy. Second, we need a process to identify the best system or systems for Toronto -- a course being promoted by the Toronto chapter of Fair Vote Canada.
Only when humans are again permitted to build authentic urbanism -- those cities, towns, and villages that nurture us by their comforts and delights -- will we cease the despoiling of Nature by escaping to sprawl.
- Andrés Duany, 'Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream'
Last May, I resolved to start a movement to encourage Torontonians to eat their ballots on October 25. I'm not normally one to promote and encourage movements of entrenched disenfranchisement but this mayoral election had so disappointed me, eating my ballot seemed to be a better option than any other, i.e. voting for a candidate.
As I talked to others who are normally just as engaged in local politics as I am, it was clear that disenfranchisement was widespread.
I wondered why, until I went to an all-candidates debate hosted by Brian Mulroney's son Ben.
I once crisscrossed Canada during an election to explore what politics means to people. A toy shop owner in Edmonton said she had no idea what led her to vote as she did. "Maybe it was something I heard, while driving, about a leader's wife making a fuss over a seat on a plane," she said. "It scares me, not knowing." Here are some potential incitements from the mayoral race.