TortureSyndicate content

Redeye

Obama administration refuses to condemn torturers

February 16, 2010
| In Washington, the Justice Department is about to issue an ethics report, reviewing the use of torture by U.S. officials.
Length: 11:54

The Harper Attack on Canadian Democracy Documented

 

 

A collection of links presented by Defend Parliament, who encourages you to pass them on and to join the Facebook group where they are posted.

http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=260348091419&topic=13108

Columnists

Proroguing less trouble than sitting

Stephen Harper has created a hornet's nest for himself with his decision to prorogue Parliament, arousing the wrath of even the social-networking crowd.

The Prime Minister isn't stupid. He likely realized his action would get him in trouble, but that it would be less trouble than he'd be in if Parliament kept sitting.

As most acknowledge, Harper was trying to take the steam out of the growing furor over Canada's role in handing over Afghan detainees to probable torture, hoping the public will lose interest.

Derrick O'Keefe

It's no secret: Torture and the Afghan War

| December 21, 2009
Columnists

The danger of a casual approach to torture

The irritation of members of the Harper government has been palpable in recent weeks as they tap their toes impatiently, wondering when they can return to the serious business of waging war without all these rude interruptions about torture.

Last Friday on CBC Radio's The Current, Laurie Hawn, parliamentary secretary to Defence Minister Peter MacKay, complained about all the "nitpicking" and insisted that the Afghan detainee issue is not one that concerns Canadians.

This dismissive attitude -- which permeates the Harper government -- is puzzling.

At stake is whether Ottawa knowingly allowed prisoners to be transferred to situations where they would likely be tortured.

Harper government strategy on torture: Talk out the clock

Richard Colvin: "According to our information, the likelihood is that all the Afghans we handed over were tortured...We kept hopeless records, and apparently to prevent any scrutiny, the Canadian Forces leadership concealed all this behind walls of secrecy....Instead of winning hearts and minds, we caused Kandaharis to fear the foreigners...Canada's detainee practices in my view alienated us from the population and strengthened the insurgency." Testifying before the House of Commons Special Committee, Nov. 18.

Peter MacKay: "Clearly the reality is there is no credible evidence, none, zero, to suggest that a Taliban prisoner transferred from Canadian Forces was ever abused." Question Period, Nov. 19.

embedded_video

Derrick O'Keefe

Will he resign? Peter MacKay's 'very bad day' gets worse

| December 9, 2009
James Laxer

Harper and MacKay have a wicked sense of humour

| November 27, 2009
Columnists

Long live the leakers

This week's Afghan detainee hearings in Ottawa have been a lesson in how useful some actual information can be. Here's what I mean:

Afghanistan's Bagram Prison exposed

Two brothers and former prisoners at Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan give their testimony about the harsh abuse they witnessed while being captured. Their tale is an example of just how difficult and complex the situation in Afghanistan is. To watch other videos or to sign the petition urging President Obama to Rethink Afghanistan policy go to: rethinkafghanistan.co.

Syndicate content