Frances RussellSyndicate content

in her own words

Layton's state funeral could backfire on Harper

Prime Minister Stephen Harper's decision to give the late NDP leader Jack Layton a state funeral can be parsed two ways: a noble gesture or a Machiavellian political manoeuvre to further marginalize his original foe, the leaderless, languishing Liberals.

But no one, least of all Harper himself, could have predicted Canadians' week-long outpouring of emotion. Was it a fleeting historical moment? Or something more profound? If the former, political normalcy will return with the opening of Parliament Sept. 21. If the latter, the state funeral could turn out to be Harper's biggest political mistake yet.

embedded_video

rabble news

AbitibiBowater case pushes NAFTA's 'investor's rights' over Crown land ownership


Ottawa's $130 million out-of-court settlement with forestry giant AbitibiBowater has created a precedent undermining provincial ownership and control of resources under Canada's constitution, an international trade policy expert says.

"This is a decision that should concern all Canadian provincial governments, in terms of regulating and developing their publicly owned resources, and concern all Canadians," says Scott Sinclair, a former senior trade policy adviser with the B.C. government, now a senior research fellow with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

embedded_video

in her own words

How Fox North became Harper's priority

Remember the attack ad the Paul Martin Liberals used in the 2006 federal election campaign that backfired so badly it helped galvanize Canadians to turf them out instead?

Aimed at terrifying Canadians about the militaristic and undemocratic impulses of Stephen Harper's Conservatives, the Liberal ad intoned over a war drumbeat: "Soldiers with guns... In our cities... In Canada... We did not make this up."

Today the tables could be abruptly turned on the Conservatives with this far more sinister message: "The prime minister's office. In a first-world democracy. Controlling a major media network. We did not make this up."

embedded_video

in her own words

The economist in Harper knows exactly why he's decimating the census

Industry Minister Tony Clement's tweets aside, Stephen Harper's Conservatives know that changing the 2011 long-form census from compulsory to voluntary makes it useless for public and private Canadian decision makers. That's exactly why they're doing it.

An economist, the prime minister understands the value of statistics. He appreciates that authoritative statistics on the relative social and economic well-being of individual Canadians empower the disempowered to demand government programs (higher taxes) to reduce poverty and disparity and promote upward mobility.

embedded_video

in her own words

Harper laws for Harper government?

Is Canada governed by the rule of law -- or only by the laws acceptable to the party in power? The difference, obviously, is not mere semantics. It is the difference between democracy and authoritarianism, between constitutional government and the exercise of arbitrary power by a temporary partisan majority.

These fundamental issues arise from the Harper Conservatives' decision to abolish the Canadian Wheat Board's single desk without holding a vote among western wheat and barley growers as required by the CWB's statute.

embedded_video

politics

Harper focuses on pleasing core supporters

The combined opposition has seized control of Parliament — and Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his Conservatives couldn't be happier.They probably set their opponents up, using “narrowcasting,” a political strategy right out of U.S. President George W. Bush's playbook.

“Narrowcasting” appears counter-intuitive to a minority party's pursuit of a majority government. Instead of moving to the centre to lure the moderate majority, narrowcasting tailors its appeal to the minority party's core support to the exclusion of everyone else.

embedded_video

politics

Cuts targeted to keep the neo-cons on top

It's every man for himself, the elephant said as he danced among the chickens. That was Tommy Douglas's metaphor to remind audiences that government alone can redress the inherent inequality between the powerful and the powerless in society.

The elephant is once again dancing among the chickens. Critics of the Harper Conservative government's $1 billion fat-trimming call it deeply ideological. The cuts overwhelmingly affect Canada's most marginalized citizens. Most ideological of all is the abolition of the Court Challenges Program (CCP) and the Law Commission of Canada.

embedded_video

Syndicate content