corporate charitySyndicate content

Kraft dinner tastes differently if you don't have food security

Kraft Dinner 'tastes' entirely different, depending upon whether a given box ends up being consumed in a food-secure or in a food-insecure household.

Related story:

| February 1, 2015

Social engineering: The Harper method

Photo: Kitty Canuck
Harper wants tax incentives for corporate charity giving to weaken social services.

Related story:


Harper plays at neoliberal social engineering

The Harper government's announcement that it will change the laws regarding capital gains taxes to encourage more charitable giving strikes an ominous note for the country's political culture. Harper is mimicking -- through tax incentives -- the Conservatives in Britain who are trying to pull the same trick with what they call the Big Society initiative: promoting the privatization of social services through increased private giving. Both efforts smack of social engineering from the right. When Harper stated that he we would not recognize the country after he was through, this is in part what he was talking about.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.
Syndicate content