dutch diseaseSyndicate content

| December 27, 2013
Photo: Mel Watkins
| October 18, 2013
Christopher Majka and Thomas Mulcair
| May 7, 2013
Jim Stanford
| April 2, 2013
| March 27, 2013
Columnists

Dutch disease is dead, long live Dutch disease!

In the hyper-polarized context of Canadian energy policy debates, even suggesting that there might be a downside to the untrammeled energy boom centred in northern Alberta is enough to get you labelled a traitor or an economic illiterate -- or both. Conservative political leaders in both Ottawa and Edmonton, backed by energy-friendly think-tanks and the Sun media chain, have tried to paint such thinking as idiotic and dangerous, not deserving of serious consideration. This is a distinctly McCarthyist strategy: it relies on vilifying and marginalizing opposition, rather than debating facts and arguments.

| February 13, 2013

Resource mismanagement in Canada

Photo: SkyTruth / flickr
The first principal of effective resource economies is to not squander your wealth. Canada's record? "Lamentable."

Related rabble.ca story:

| October 16, 2012
Columnists

Canada's tar sands development: Headfirst into a staples trap

Tar sand. Photo: Suncor Energy/Flickr

Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney spoke in Calgary recently on "Dutch disease". The Governor denied emphatically that a boom in one sector (petroleum) represented a loss in another (manufacturing).

Without mentioning Tom Mulcair by name, Carney delivered a direct repudiation of the argument advanced by the leader of the Official Opposition, who has been pointing out that over-development of the Alberta sands is creating an unbalanced Canadian economy, and is not sustainable.

Syndicate content