coalition governmentSyndicate content

for the sake of argument

A coalition is good for Canada, good for parliamentary democracy

Stephen Harper can almost taste a majority. More than a decade of work to unite the right and make the new Conservative Party more palatable for Canadians has reached a point where the party has, as of mid-March, polled its highest ratings. With an election on May 2nd, Harper is very close to fulfilling his dream of majority rule.

Unless of course he falls short and the opposition parties form a coalition government.

Harper hates this possibility, naturally. He more than anyone recognizes the viability and inevitability of coalition governments.

embedded_video

Columnists

Ignatieff's career option: Coalition or bust

Job seeker: Michael Ignatieff, while on a visit to China in July 2010. Photo: Michael Ignatieff/Flickr

The Leader of the Official Opposition has put the Harper government on notice. The prime minister must cancel the scheduled reduction in the corporate income tax (worth $10 billion in lost revenue over three years) in the upcoming federal budget, or the Liberal party will vote against his government. In this case, unless it gets the (unlikely) support of the NDP or the Bloc in a budget vote, the Harper government will fall, triggering a Spring election.

Columnists

A coalition: Still the only way out

When will the Liberals and the NDP get it? Without some kind of accord between these two parties, the country is locked into a kind of political version of the movie Groundhog Day -- doomed to repeat the same depressing, cynical and destructive politics day-in, day-out until our democracy is so damaged that no one will bother voting.

Columnists

Comedy of federal politics is getting less and less amusing

Watching the comedy of federal politics is getting less and less amusing all the time.

Most of us are getting cranky because the show is lapsing into pandemonium, as we wonder whether there's some kind of proper ending to it in which the country is adequately governed or whether the prospect is for endless slapstick with sinister and costly twists.

It's not just that the Harper government is now entering the realm of the ridiculous -- the uproar over the $1.9-million "fake lake" pavilion for the G20 summit will serve as handy shorthand for a troupe whose tricks are no longer working - but that the divided opposition can do little to threaten it despite commanding two-thirds of the Canadian electorate.

Columnists

The next election and after

The real business of government is to win the next election. You do not have to channel Machiavelli to understand that prime ministers weigh the impact of government decisions by looking ahead to how what ministers do today will affect the next campaign. As the Canadian Press reported this week, the Conservatives have imposed an elaborate scheme to manage public opinion.

rabble series

Harper's hitlist: The case for electoral reform and coalition

rabble.ca columnist Murray Dobbin details the harm Prime Minister Stephen Harper is doing to the political and social fabric of Canada in a new essay commissioned by The Council of Canadians. This article is an excerpt taken from the essay, the last in a 10-part series on Harper's assault on democracy.

These are not normal times. Canada's democracy is in crisis. We have a prime minister and a government that have demonstrated they are unfit to govern. But crises also present opportunities -- opportunities to ensure the same crisis is not repeated.

embedded_video

Columnists

A coalition solution to Canada's democracy crisis

Canada is in the midst of a crisis in democracy unique in its history. There is simply no other historical example that one can compare it to. It is multi-faceted and it affects every aspect of our national politics and political discourse. It is inexorably eroding the political fabric of the country and therefore our viability as a democratic nation.

for the sake of argument

Harper plays the phony percentages of first-past-the-post

As we swing into the final days of the 2011 federal election campaign, Conservative leader Stephen Harper has offered up some misleading, even false interpretations of our system of government -- if the constitution of Canada is anything to go by. Voters have a right to expect those competing for jobs as MPs (and especially those seeking the office of prime minister) to know the basic rules and conventions of an 800-year tradition that has guided British-derived Westminster parliamentary systems throughout most of the Commonwealth. With the government of the country at stake, it is worth unpacking a few of Stephen Harper's key claims.

embedded_video

Columnists

Prime minister versus Parliament: Democracy demands Conservative defeat

The first responsibility of a prime minister is to uphold the Canadian constitution. As prime minister, Stephen Harper broke the most solemn undertaking a government makes under the constitution: its obligation to present its spending plans to parliament.

As a result of refusing to reveal the cost of the F-35 fighter jets, or the "tough on crime" legislation, the Harper Conservatives were found in contempt of parliament. When by a vote of 156 to 145 his government lost the confidence of parliament, the Governor-General acceded to the request of the outgoing prime minister and called the May 2 election.

Syndicate content