Harper governmentSyndicate content

Harper's frontal assault on retirement incomes

Photo: Danielle Scott/flickr
The Harper government is engaging in a fresh frontal assault on the retirement incomes of beleagured Canadian workers, through changes to long-standing legislation governing workplace pensions.

Related rabble.ca story:

Columnists

How Harper's latest attack on pensions would erode retirement security

Photo: Danielle Scott/flickr

Quaint as it now seems, not long ago this was considered a good basic plan: Work hard all your life and then retire with a comfortable pension.

In recent times, a new plan has replaced it: Work hard all your life and then all bets are off.

The notion of retirement security in exchange for a lifetime of hard work -- a central element in the implicit social contract between capital and labour in the postwar years -- has been effectively tossed aside, as corporations have become more insatiable in their demands and governments have increasingly abandoned workers.

Stephen Harper's government hiked the eligibility age for Old Age Security benefits to 67, effectively depriving all future Canadian retirees of two years of basic retirement income.

Do Canadians share Israel's values 'through Fire and Water'?

Photo: flickr/Israel Defense Forces

In mid-July the Harper government quietly released a campaign-style video called Through Fire and Water. In it, Canada's Prime Minister and Foreign Affairs Minister strongly reassert our support for Israel amid the violence in Gaza. The video proclaims that "Canada and Israel are the Greatest of Friends, and the most natural of allies" and that it is the "Canadian tradition to stand for what is principled and just regardless of whether it is convenient or popular."

To understand what this means for Canada as Canadians, we need to look at some of the tragic events taking place in Israel-Palestine.

embedded_video

Photo: flickr/Jeff Nelson
| July 30, 2014
Columnists

Charities and the limits of political action under the Harper government

Environmental Defence. PEN Canada. Amnesty International Canada. The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Canada Without Poverty. The David Suzuki Foundation.

What do these organizations have in common -- aside from all doing great work?

All are registered charities.

All have been publicly critical of Stephen Harper's government.

And all are undergoing audits of their political activities by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA).

What's this about? Here's what you need to know.

When organizations seek charitable registration from government in order to entice donors who would like tax receipts, they necessarily accept oversight by a government agency that, in an atmosphere as poisonous as Canada's these days, can overreach.

Photo: flickr/Stephen Harper
| July 29, 2014

Debunking the Bogeyman: The power of the media pundits

Photo: flickr/OTA Photos

Moody's, Standard and Poor's (S&P), and, to a lesser extent, Fitch raked in billions of dollars during the wild prelude to the financial crisis of 2007-2008, which imploded the world economy.

Matt Taibbi, writing at the time for Rolling Stone (June 19, 2013), stated bluntly, "...we now know that the nation's two top ratings companies, Moody's and S&P, have for many years been shameless tools for the banks, willing to give just about anything a high rating in exchange for cash." Between 2002 and 2007, fees for the "Big Three" credit ratings agencies (CRAs) doubled from $3 billion to $6 billion.

embedded_video

Photo: wolfpeterson/flickr
| July 28, 2014
July 25, 2014 |
Is the extensive audit of PEN Canada further evidence that the Harper government is using the agency to attack its critics?
July 25, 2014 |
A deep look and further analysis of Bill C-24 shows that it makes it harder to acquire Canadian citizenship and easier to lose it, while increasing discrimination.
Syndicate content