19 January, The Hill Times full page ad -- Please Mr. Ignatieff, do not appease Harper.

3 posts / 0 new
Last post
19 January, The Hill Times full page ad -- Please Mr. Ignatieff, do not appease Harper.

                                     Please Mr. Ignatieff,
                                   do not appease Harper.

Mr. Ignattief, there is only one reason, worthy of dignity, for you to give Stephen Harper your vote of confidence and allow him to remain as Prime Minister. The reason is you’ve judged that, in these times threatening all Canadians, they will be safer led by Stephen Harper than by you. Is that your judgment?

All other reasons, however rationalized, will be partisan opportunism, borne of the same species as Stephen Harper’s 27 November 2008 Economic and Fiscal Statement. Such Harper-like reasons are contrived to advance personal ambition and political party fortunes with little regard for the cost exacted from the common needs, rights, and expectations of Canadians.

On 7 September 2008, Stephen Harper engineered a general election—in contempt of his own fixed election date law. Since then he has revealed himself more than merely uninterested and incapable of helping Canadians; he has revealed himself a present and future danger to us all. It’s not only that Stephen Harper deceives us, despises laws and rights, disdains his professed principles, dismisses the counsel of those more capable than he, detests constraints on his power, and denied the enormity of the dire economic threats endangering Canadians. No, not only that. In the week before Parliament was prorogued, Stephen Harper raised hate between Canadians—risked rending Canada apart—to keep his clutch on power. During a national emergency when the only safe course was to bring Canadians together, Stephen Harper wreaked an assault on Canadian unity and cooperation to service his own ambitions and satisfy his own enmities. Stephen Harper—the man, the politician, and his duplicity—is a greater danger to Canadians personally than the economic storm they are struggling to survive. Would you, Mr. Ignatieff, abandon Canadians to him?

Stephen Harper, in further deception, would have us believe that the coming confidence vote concerns his latest budget attempt—a budget crafted not to help Canadians, but to keep him in power by assuaging you and your Opposition colleagues. In truth, the only confidence matter at issue is Stephen Harper himself: a man whom you know to be incompetent and unprincipled, and whom Canadians can neither trust nor depend upon.

Tellingly, Stephen Harper appointed eighteen new Conservative Senators and is not preparing his caucus or party for an election. Stephen Harper is acting as someone who believes—perhaps as a consequence of his discussions with the Governor General—that the pending confidence vote can produce only one of two outcomes: either he will remain Prime Minister or the Governor General will ask you to form a government.

Do not appease Harper, Mr. Ignatieff, under the illusion however convincing or comfortable that you can help Canadians or rebuild the Liberal Party, even in the short-term, from the Opposition bench. From that weak and impoverished obscurity, you may be able to soften some of Stephen Harper’s worst inclinations, but Canadians nonetheless will suffer from them.

Three, perhaps four, years from now the worst of the present crisis will have abated. Fears will have calmed. Recovery will be reality. And, the hyper-amplified political ephemera of this time will be long forgotten. Then, the Prime Minister—either Stephen Harper or you—will ask the people for a mandate in order to continue improving the lives of Canadians. The history and nature of elections, campaigns, and voters argues that the Prime Minister of that day will be re elected, likely with a majority that will endure for a decade or more. The Opposition leader’s campaign claim at that time will be that he would have led Canadians better through the crisis. Even if true, it will have insignificant resonance. The claim will truly beat hollow if you are the Opposition leader: the man who, when it mattered most, declined the call and opportunity to lead, inspire, and give Canadians hope. They will rightly ask, “If you were unwilling to help us to your full measure in the worst of times, what reason can there be to let you lead us in better times?”

                               Animal Alliance / Environment Voters
                                   a federal registered political party


Anyone else having troubkle with Hill Times links. Today for example there is an article about the NDP spending $1,000,000 for reorganization but cannot access it. 



Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

Your link works for me, and then I clicked on the NDP link that showed up:

The Hill Times, January 19th, 2009
 Layton restructures political staff with extra $1-million NDP plots Parliamentary strategy on Hill this week. By Abbas Rana

With eight more MPs elected in the NDP caucus and an estimated extra $1-million annually to spend in the NDP House officers' Parliamentary budget, NDP Leader Jack Layton's office has been busy restructuring, and hiring political staffers to provide Parliamentary support and maximize national and regional media.

NDP House officers, including the party leader, House leader, research office, whip and caucus chair, now have an annual Parliamentary budget of $3,647,803 compared to the last Parliament when it had an annual budget of $2,690,737. This amount includes the money for information technology, caucus translation services and national caucus meetings. The Parliamentary funding is calculated after each federal election, based on the number of seats each party wins.

The NDP Leader's Office now receives a Parliamentary funding of $1,453,765 annually as opposed to the last Parliament when it got $1,023,022. The NDP Caucus Research Office now has a budget of $1,316,484 compared to the last Parliament when it got $1,101,095. The House leader now has a budget of $250,374 as opposed to $207,297. The NDP Whip's Office now has a budget of $263,295 as opposed to $220,219 and the caucus chair now has a budget of $66,653 compared to $63,723 that it had in the last Parliament.


- snip -