I would like to knwo why you are participating in this debate. By now, you should understand (as I do) that neither of us are going to convince the other.
So, why do you do it, jas? Why do you keep responding?
Jas wrote:"That should be obvious. So that people like you don't get to pretend that you know what's what, and continue to mislead others about teh cause of collapse. So that Babblers who hurl insults at "Truthers" can finally understand that the theory that they think they're supporting is based on fantasies. Your piledriver does not exist. I have said this all along. Many, many others have said this all along. Here is the proof."
You have never provided a theory respecting the cause of collapse.
You have never disproven any of the theories discussed respecting the cause of collapse.
All you have done is say "Nu-uh! You're wrong!" while claiming your position is an accepted truth here on Babble that shouldn't be questioned.
Pants-of-Dog has approached this debate with patience, and an honest attempt to answer your questions and get a straight answer out of you. Reading this threads, I see his position as this:
"The official theory, while there may be slight errors that need accounting for, is not scientifically impossible."
He then asks, basically, "What is your problem with the theory?"
To which you reply, "It's impossible!" (this appears to be your overall position)
To which he responds, "Well here's the math which proves it is possible, show me how it's impossible."
To which you come back with, "I don't need math to know it's impossible!"
So I ask Babblers to weigh in. Is Jas/Fidel's position an accepted truth here on Babble?