US Air Force admits F35 is a failure - needs new airplane after spending $1.7 trillion

5 posts / 0 new
Last post
jerrym
US Air Force admits F35 is a failure - needs new airplane after spending $1.7 trillion

The US Air Force admitted today that its F35 is a failure and that it needs a new aircraft after spending $1.7 trillion on the plane - enough to house every homeless person 28 times over or wipe out all student debt. 

The United States Air Force announced the need for a new multi-use fighter jet to replace its aging F-16 fleet, while stressing that it would not feature the same high-price tag and technological prowess of the F-35. The announcement, made by Air Force Chief of Staff General Charles Brown came as a surprise to defence analysts, given that the F-35 was pegged as the modern fifth generation aircraft that would replace the F-16. Instead, Air Force Chief Brown suggested they would develop a “fifth-generation-minus” fighter jet.

Nearly twenty years ago, the USAF set out to develop a replacement to the F-16’s successor, but the program only continued to grow prohibitively expensive as more cutting edge technology was poured into it. When it grew too expensive, other nations were brought in as partners to offset the runaway costs.

In an ironic twist, the F-35 has become the kind of dilemma it was initially supposed to resolve. Now, a new fighter jet is needed to meet the needs of the US Air Force. Running the F-35 for 66 years is expected to cost $1.182 trillion, on top of its already hefty development cost of $397.8 billion. The F-35 costs slightly less than $100 million per plane. But cost is the least of its concerns.

Bugs and flaws

In spite of its advanced technology and cutting-edge capabilities, the latest stealth fighter suffers from structural flaws and slew of challenges. Most recent among them is a structural engine flaw and shortage in its production. The F-35’s engine problem is partly based in not being able to deliver them for maintenance as fast as needed, in addition to a problem with the heat coating on its rotor blades which shortens engine lifespan considerably. Defense News described it as a “serious readiness problem”, suggesting that as soon as 2022, nearly 5 to 6 per ent of the F-35 fleet could be effectively grounded as it waits for engine replacements.

Another challenge is the plane’s software. Most modern fighter jets have between 1 to 2 million lines of code in their software. The F-35 averages 8 million lines of code in its software, and it’s suffering from a bug problem. ...

The fighter jet also suffers from a slightly embarrassing touchscreen problem. After making the switch from hard flipped switches to touch screens, pilots report that unlike a physical switch that you’re confident has been activated, touch screens in the plane don’t work 20 percent of the time says one F-35 pilot. 

Aging fleet, modern enemies

Amid all these challenges, To justify his decision, Air Force Chief Brown compared the F-35 to a Ferrari.  “You don’t drive your Ferrari to work every day, you only drive it on Sundays. This is our ‘high end’ fighter, we want to make sure we don’t use it all for the low-end fight,” he said in a press conference on February 17. In a nutshell, Brown wants to limit how often the F-35 is being used, as then develop a less advanced replacement.

In essence, the F-35 was designed to have ultimate technological superiority. But doing too much means compromises in design. To adapt to different demands, the F-35 has multiple, costly versions. Lockheed Martin provides a regular version suited to land operations, one specifically designed for aircraft carrier take-off, a smaller naval variant, not to mention a vertical take-off variant.  But having so many versions of the F-35 leads to a much more complex design. Resolving issues in one variant, doesn’t mean they’re resolved in the rest. 

Unfortunately, there’s nothing to prevent the next fifth generation ‘minus’ plane from encountering the same challenges that brought the F-35 to its current predicament. 

https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/us-admits-f-35-failed-to-replace-f-16-...

NDPP

Yep. More here...

Indications Canada may buy overbudget F-35 lemon jets

https://rabble.ca/babble/national-news/indications-canada-may-buy-overbu...

josh

Think of the domestic programs that could have used that money.

NDPP

While remembering that the biggest US defence budget in history was approved by both parties.

NDPP

Makers of next-generation fighter jets tout economic benefits as Ottawa readies COVID-19 stimulus plans

https://montrealgazette.com/news/politics/makers-of-next-generation-figh...

"Industry boosters point out that the estimated $19B needed for the program has already been set aside, offering meaningful stimulus without new government debt. An announcement from Lockheed Martin, which manufactures the F-35A, said it would generate $16.9 billion for the Canadian economy..."

Forget hospitals and medical care, schools, mass transit or clean water and environmental improvement - giving billions to the war...err sorry, defence industry is the best kind of economic 'stimulus', no? And how are we supposed to help Biden bomb Syria, Russia, China or Iran with those embarrassingly retro F-16s?

Forget the Jets!

[email protected]

[email protected]